John Corrigan
About
In The Last Decade
John Corrigan
5 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 383
- Biomedical Engineering 269
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 144
- Surgery 86
- Epidemiology 13
Countries citing papers authored by John Corrigan
This map shows the geographic impact of John Corrigan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Corrigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Corrigan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Corrigan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Corrigan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Corrigan. The network helps show where John Corrigan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Corrigan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Corrigan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Corrigan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Corrigan. John Corrigan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Implant removal on an outpatient basis. A patient satisfaction survey. | 4 |
| 4 | 139 | |
| 5 | 209 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 56 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.