John Coleman

123 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

John Coleman
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 657
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 130
  • Epidemiology 316
  • Hepatology 66
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 125
Replace Donald Kirson with:
Donald Kirson United States
Anna Lichtwarck‐Aschoff Netherlands
Stephen L. Benton United States
Cary J. Roseth United States
Clark C. Presson United States
Frank H. Farley United States
Ανδρέας Δημητρίου Cyprus
Fumiaki Hamagami United States
Dario Cvencek A United States
Dermot Lynott United Kingdom
John Coleman relative to Donald Kirson United States Donald Kirson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.8×
Donald Kirson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Coleman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Coleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Coleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Coleman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Coleman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Coleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Coleman. The network helps show where John Coleman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Coleman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Coleman Line = papers co-authored together John Coleman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005321
2 2011233
3 1997141
4 1978116
5 1981111
6 2005104
7 196758
8 200154
9 199050
10 200750
11 201649
12 199248
13 200347
14 200945
15 199244
16 200142
17 198237
18
The focal theory of adolescence: a psychological perspective
198936
19
Teenage Sexuality: Health, Risk and Education
199835
20 200835

About John Coleman

John Coleman is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 129 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (31 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (10 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (6 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (5 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers) and Hepatitis C virus research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (657 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (130 citations), Epidemiology (316 citations), Hepatology (66 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (125 citations). John Coleman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Greg Kochanski, Esther Grabe, Janet Breckenridge Pierrehumbert, David Richard Moore, Luis Alberto Viola, Ian G Barrison, Iain M. Murray‐Lyon, J R Curtis, I M Murray-Lyon and Leo B. Hendry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Virology, The Lancet, Journal of Adolescence, Sexually Transmitted Infections and Journal of Neurolinguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact