John C. Goodlett

643 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 504 citations indexed

About

John C. Goodlett is a scholar working on Ecology, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, John C. Goodlett has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 504 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Ecology, 2 papers in Plant Science and 1 paper in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in John C. Goodlett's work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers) and Historical Geography and Cartography (1 paper). John C. Goodlett is often cited by papers focused on Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers) and Historical Geography and Cartography (1 paper). John C. Goodlett collaborates with scholars based in United States. John C. Goodlett's co-authors include John T. Hack, Margaret B. Davis, Charles Storrow Denny and W. Schneider and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, The Quarterly Review of Biology and USGS professional paper.

In The Last Decade

John C. Goodlett

5 papers receiving 376 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the central Appalachians

1960 397 citations John T. Hack, John C. Goodlett USGS professional paper profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John C. Goodlett United States	4	232	167	166	131	125	6	504
John M. Tromble United States	13	275 1.2×	306 1.8×	99 0.6×	76 0.6×	245 2.0×	25	681
H. Brad Musick United States	10	301 1.3×	237 1.4×	146 0.9×	58 0.4×	229 1.8×	11	691
F. A. Branson United States	12	262 1.1×	91 0.5×	45 0.3×	31 0.2×	139 1.1×	25	463
I. S. McQueen United States	11	126 0.5×	67 0.4×	50 0.3×	45 0.3×	108 0.9×	12	387
Jack Major United States	8	83 0.4×	34 0.2×	303 1.8×	64 0.5×	107 0.9×	12	513
Rodney J. Arkley United States	7	72 0.3×	116 0.7×	167 1.0×	23 0.2×	117 0.9×	16	423
Benjamin L. Everitt Spain	6	397 1.7×	279 1.7×	89 0.5×	28 0.2×	156 1.2×	6	512
F. C. Westin United States	7	87 0.4×	109 0.7×	81 0.5×	41 0.3×	29 0.2×	23	365
Russell S. Kinerson United States	8	182 0.8×	93 0.6×	145 0.9×	26 0.2×	493 3.9×	13	758
Wang Shao China	10	144 0.6×	221 1.3×	139 0.8×	40 0.3×	181 1.4×	38	517

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Goodlett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Goodlett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Goodlett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Goodlett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Goodlett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Goodlett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Goodlett. The network helps show where John C. Goodlett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Goodlett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Goodlett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Goodlett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Goodlett. John C. Goodlett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Goodlett, John C.. (1964). Where There is Life.Paul B. Sears. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 39(3). 283–284.

2.

Denny, Charles Storrow, et al.. (1963). Surficial geology and soils of the Elmira-Williamsport region, New York and Pennsylvania, with a section on forest regions and great soil groups. USGS professional paper. 7 indexed citations

3.

Schneider, W. & John C. Goodlett. (1962). Portrayal of drainage and vegetation on topographic maps. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 1 indexed citations

4.

Davis, Margaret B. & John C. Goodlett. (1960). Comparison of the Present Vegetation with Pollen‐Spectra in Surface Samples from Brownington Pond, Vermont. Ecology. 41(2). 346–357. 94 indexed citations

5.

Hack, John T. & John C. Goodlett. (1960). Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the central Appalachians. USGS professional paper. 397 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Goodlett, John C.. (1960). The development of site concepts at the Harvard Forest and their impact upon management policy.. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact