John C. Fenwick
- Surgery top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Juan J. RoncoDean R. ChittockVinay DhingraP. Terry PhangMartin TweeddaleJames A. RussellKeith R. WalleyBarry Wiggs
- Topics
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers)Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
John C. Fenwick
18 papers receiving 853 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Surgery 336
- Epidemiology 277
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 242
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 187
- Emergency Medicine 170
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Fenwick
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Fenwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Fenwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Fenwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Fenwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Fenwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Fenwick. The network helps show where John C. Fenwick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Fenwick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Fenwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Fenwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Fenwick. John C. Fenwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purulent pericarditis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept and methotrexate. | 9 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 63 | |
| 4 | 134 | |
| 5 | 69 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 86 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 109 | |
| 14 | 120 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Retinoid-binding proteins in cone-dominant retinas. | 33 |
About John C. Fenwick
John C. Fenwick is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (242 citations), Emergency Medicine (170 citations) and Nephrology (124 citations). John C. Fenwick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Juan J. Ronco, Dean R. Chittock, Vinay Dhingra, P. Terry Phang, Martin Tweeddale, James A. Russell, Keith R. Walley, Barry Wiggs, William R. Henderson and B. R. Wiggs. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Neuroscience and CHEST Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.