John Broome

3.4k total citations
36 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

John Broome is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, John Broome has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Philosophy, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in John Broome's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers). John Broome is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers). John Broome collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. John Broome's co-authors include Wilfred Beckerman, F. P. Bierlein, Dale Jamieson, David I. Groves, David Ulph, Т. М. Scanlon, Benjamin Hale, Kok‐Chor Tan, Thomas Christiano and Axel Gosseries and has published in prestigious journals such as The Economic Journal, The Review of Economic Studies and Scientific American.

In The Last Decade

John Broome

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

John Broome

PHILO

CN

EE

ECP

GPC

Peter Vallentyne United States

Larry S. Temkin United States

Gregory S. Kavka United States

Thomas Hurka Canada

Michael Williams United States

Arthur Ripstein Canada

Christian Barry Australia

Dudley Knowles United Kingdom

Peter H. Hare United States

Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen Denmark

Peter Vallentyne United States

John Broome

402 ×0.7

PHILO

273 ×0.8

CN

195 ×0.7

EE

81 ×0.3

ECP

59 ×0.3

GPC

Citations per year, relative to John Broome John Broome (= 1×) peers Peter Vallentyne

Countries citing papers authored by John Broome

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Broome's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Broome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Broome more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Broome

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Broome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Broome. The network helps show where John Broome may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Broome

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Broome. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Broome based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Broome. John Broome is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Broome, John. (2024). The Value of Life in the Social Cost of Carbon: A Critique and a Proposal. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. 15(S1). 110–126. 1 indexed citations

2.

Broome, John. (2021). Normativity, Rationality and Reasoning. 2 indexed citations

3.

Broome, John. (2016). Responses. Philosophical Studies. 173(12). 3431–3448. 1 indexed citations

4.

Broome, John, et al.. (2013). The Punishment that Leaves Something to Chance. 8 indexed citations

5.

Broome, John. (2012). Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World. 105 indexed citations

6.

Broome, John. (2009). REPLY TO RABINOWICZ. Philosophical Issues. 19(1). 412–417. 16 indexed citations

7.

Broome, John. (2008). The Ethics of Climate Change. Scientific American. 298(6). 96–102. 106 indexed citations

8.

Broome, John. (2008). Reply to Southwood, Kearns and Star, and Cullity. Ethics. 119(1). 96–108. 27 indexed citations

9.

Broome, John. (2008). What is your life worth?. Daedalus. 137(1). 49–56. 7 indexed citations

10.

Broome, John. (2007). Does Rationality Consist in Responding Correctly to Reasons?. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 4(3). 349–374. 54 indexed citations

11.

Broome, John. (2006). “Reasoning with Preferences?”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 59. 183–208. 2 indexed citations

12.

Broome, John. (1997). II–John Broome. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 71(1). 131–147. 15 indexed citations

13.

Jamieson, Dale & John Broome. (1996). Counting the Cost of Global Warming.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 46(183). 263–263. 6 indexed citations

14.

Broome, John. (1995). The two-envelope paradox. Analysis. 55(1). 6–11. 34 indexed citations

15.

Broome, John. (1995). The Two-Envelope Paradox. Analysis. 55(1). 6–6. 1 indexed citations

16.

Broome, John. (1992). Reply to Blackorby and Donaldson, and Drèze. Recherches économiques de Louvain. 58(2). 167–171. 8 indexed citations

17.

Broome, John. (1992). Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations.Edward F. McClennen. Ethics. 102(3). 666–668. 3 indexed citations

18.

Broome, John. (1991). “Utility”. Economics and Philosophy. 7(1). 1–12. 59 indexed citations

19.

Broome, John. (1985). The Economic Value of Life. Economica. 52(207). 281–281. 37 indexed citations

20.

Broome, John. (1972). Approximate equilibrium in economies with indivisible commodities. Journal of Economic Theory. 5(2). 224–249. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact