John Broome

3.5k citations
36 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

John Broome

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

John Broome
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • General Decision Sciences 106
  • Philosophy 545
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 246
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 349
  • History and Philosophy of Science 67
Replace Peter Vallentyne with:
Peter Vallentyne United States
Larry S. Temkin United States
Gregory S. Kavka United States
Thomas Hurka Canada
Michael Williams United States
Dudley Knowles United Kingdom
Arthur Ripstein Canada
Christian Barry Australia
Peter H. Hare United States
Kai Spiekermann United Kingdom
John Broome relative to Peter Vallentyne United States Peter Vallentyne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Peter Vallentyne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Broome

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Broome's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Broome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Broome more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Broome

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Broome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Broome. The network helps show where John Broome may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Broome, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Broome Line = papers co-authored together John Broome links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999236
2 2008107
3
Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World
2012105
4 199384
5 200578
6 201273
7 199161
8 200754
9 201842
10 198537
11 197236
12 199534
13 199034
14 201229
15 200827
16 200917
17 200817
18 201515
19 199715
20 201514

About John Broome

John Broome is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (106 citations), Philosophy (545 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (246 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (349 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (67 citations). John Broome has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Wilfred Beckerman, Dale Jamieson, F. P. Bierlein, David Ulph, David I. Groves, Т. М. Scanlon, Kok‐Chor Tan, Simon Keller, Chris Armstrong and Axel Gosseries. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophical Issues, Ethics, Philosophical Studies and The Economic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact