John Brodersen

7.1k citations
215 papers · 4.2k indexed · h-index 35

John Brodersen

189 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

John Brodersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Oncology 1.3k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.5k
  • Health Informatics 50
  • Otorhinolaryngology 159
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 811
Replace Ruth C. Carlos with:
Ruth C. Carlos United States
James B. Semmens Australia
Angel M. Cronin United States
Art Sedrakyan United States
Brian L. Egleston United States
C.S. Pramesh India
Wilbert B. van den Hout Netherlands
Fares Alahdab United States
Peter Angelos United States
Allison M. Deal United States
John Brodersen relative to Ruth C. Carlos United States Ruth C. Carlos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ruth C. Carlos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Brodersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Brodersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Brodersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Brodersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Brodersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Brodersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Brodersen. The network helps show where John Brodersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Brodersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Brodersen Line = papers co-authored together John Brodersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20247
3 20240
4 20235
5 20230
6 20232
7 20239
8 20213
9 202124
10 202031
11 202041
12 202019
13 202016
14 202038
15 20207
16 202012
17 202028
18 201919
19
The efficacy of acupuncture on menopausal symptoms (ACOM study): protocol for a randomised study.
20173
20 201018

About John Brodersen

John Brodersen is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Oncology, Family Practice, General Health Professions and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 215 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (59 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (35 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (18 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (17 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (15 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (15 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.3k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.5k citations), Health Informatics (50 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (159 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (811 citations). John Brodersen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Volkert Siersma, Hanne Thorsen, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Jesper Holst Pedersen, Bruno Heleno, Asger Dirksen, Jonathan D. Comins, Michael R. Krogsgaard, Jakob Fraes Rasmussen and Haseem Ashraf. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, BMJ Open, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, BMJ and Health Risk & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026