John Armitage

56 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

John Armitage
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Transplantation 56
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 56
  • Computer Science Applications 45
  • History and Philosophy of Science 31
  • Communication 39
Replace Lisa Gitelman with:
Lisa Gitelman Switzerland
Siva Vaidhyanathan United States
Martha Woodmansee United States
André Millard United States
Ned Rossiter Australia
Richard Barbrook United Kingdom
Adrian Johns United States
Christian Borch Denmark
Robert Anchor United States
Astrid Mager Austria
John Armitage relative to Lisa Gitelman Switzerland Lisa Gitelman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×56×
Lisa Gitelman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Armitage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Armitage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Armitage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Armitage more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Armitage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Armitage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Armitage. The network helps show where John Armitage may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Armitage, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Armitage Line = papers co-authored together John Armitage links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Adverse effects associated with the use of FK 506.
1991134
2 200170
3 200258
4 200042
5 200634
6 200427
7 200825
8 200521
9 200618
10
Overview of FK506 in transplantation.
199015
11 200315
12 200513
13 201411
14
Resisting the Neoliberal Discourse of Technology The Politics of Cyberculture in the Age of the Virtual Class
199911
15 201511
16 199911
17
Virilio Now: Current Perspectives in Virilio Studies
201010
18 200110
19 202210
20 201610

About John Armitage

John Armitage is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy, Urban Studies and Communication, having authored 70 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art, Politics, and Modernism (6 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (5 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (4 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies (3 papers), Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation (3 papers) and Fashion and Cultural Textiles (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (56 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (56 citations), Computer Science Applications (45 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations) and Communication (39 citations). John Armitage has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Roberts, John J. Fung, M Alessiani, A Jain, Kareem Abu‐Elmagd, Ron Shapiro, Andreas G. Tzakis, S Todo, J McCauley and David Van Thiel. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural Politics an International Journal, Angelaki, Theory Culture & Society, French Cultural Studies and interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact