John A. Smith

1.0k total citations
33 papers, 674 citations indexed

About

John A. Smith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John A. Smith has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 674 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Plant Science, 6 papers in Soil Science and 3 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in John A. Smith's work include Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers). John A. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers). John A. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. John A. Smith's co-authors include Rob Wilson, C. Dean Yonts, Bernard P. Boudreau, Sandor Mulsow, Stephen D. Kachman, Michael F. Kocher, James Brinkhoff, John Hornbuckle, Carlos Ballester and Wendy C. Quayle and has published in prestigious journals such as Limnology and Oceanography, British Journal of Cancer and Remote Sensing.

In The Last Decade

John A. Smith

30 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John A. Smith United States	11	396	117	93	87	84	33	674
David Hall Australia	15	141 0.4×	116 1.0×	260 2.8×	146 1.7×	116 1.4×	46	689
Helvécio De‐Polli Brazil	13	330 0.8×	93 0.8×	448 4.8×	89 1.0×	104 1.2×	54	740
Nicolai Koebernick United Kingdom	16	680 1.7×	132 1.1×	346 3.7×	74 0.9×	68 0.8×	25	1.0k
Lawrence R. Parsons United States	16	587 1.5×	141 1.2×	178 1.9×	36 0.4×	24 0.3×	39	810
Maire Holz Germany	18	649 1.6×	133 1.1×	504 5.4×	93 1.1×	167 2.0×	40	1.1k
D.W.G. van Kraalingen Netherlands	12	322 0.8×	235 2.0×	127 1.4×	105 1.2×	124 1.5×	32	632
R.W. Ashton United Kingdom	13	542 1.4×	63 0.5×	389 4.2×	165 1.9×	60 0.7×	24	886
Deepak Singh India	14	266 0.7×	54 0.5×	194 2.1×	69 0.8×	37 0.4×	75	587
Ronald B. Sorensen United States	18	813 2.1×	112 1.0×	334 3.6×	105 1.2×	45 0.5×	84	1.1k
S. G. Reynolds United Kingdom	10	200 0.5×	101 0.9×	152 1.6×	75 0.9×	73 0.9×	22	718

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Smith. The network helps show where John A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John A. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John A. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John A. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John A. Smith. John A. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ferguson, Gemma, et al.. (2020). Using technology to harmonise treatment approaches in colposcopy in the face of a changing environment. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 255. 40–43. 1 indexed citations

Rebolj, Matejka, Adam R. Brentnall, Christopher Mathews, et al.. (2019). 16/18 genotyping in triage of persistent human papillomavirus infections with negative cytology in the English cervical screening pilot. British Journal of Cancer. 121(6). 455–463. 26 indexed citations

Ballester, Carlos, John Hornbuckle, James Brinkhoff, John A. Smith, & Wendy C. Quayle. (2017). Assessment of In-Season Cotton Nitrogen Status and Lint Yield Prediction from Unmanned Aerial System Imagery. Remote Sensing. 9(11). 1149–1149. 67 indexed citations

Charlton, Peter, Luigi Camporota, John A. Smith, et al.. (2015). Non-invasive attractor reconstruction analysis for early detection of deteriorations. Research Portal (King's College London). 1 indexed citations

Hulugalle, N. R., et al.. (2015). Australian Cotton Production Manual 2015. 13 indexed citations

Liu, Beiyu, Najat Mariee, Susan Laird, et al.. (2014). The prognostic value of uNK cell count and histological dating in the mid-luteal phase of women with reproductive failure. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 181. 171–175. 15 indexed citations

Palmer, Julia E., et al.. (2012). The Outcome for Women With Microinvasive Cervical Cancer With Stromal Invasion 1 mm or Less. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 31(5). 470–474. 5 indexed citations

Yonts, C. Dean, John A. Smith, & Rob Wilson. (2002). Evaluation of Cover Crop System for Sugarbeet Production Under Furrow Irrigation. Journal of Sugarbeet Research. 39(1). 25–36. 4 indexed citations

Wilson, Rob, et al.. (2000). Row Spacing, Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) Density, and Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) Cultivar Effects on Sugarbeet Development. Journal of Sugarbeet Research. 37(2). 11–32. 10 indexed citations

10.

Yonts, C. Dean & John A. Smith. (1997). Effects of Plant Population and Row Width on Yield of Sugarbeet. Journal of Sugarbeet Research. 34(1&2). 21–30. 10 indexed citations

11.

Shelton, David P., et al.. (1995). G95-1135 Estimating Percent Residue Cover Using the Calculation Method. Insecta mundi. 8 indexed citations

12.

Lyon, Drew J., John A. Smith, & David D. Jones. (1994). Sampling Wheat (Triticum aestivum) at the Elevator for Jointed Goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Technology. 8(1). 64–68. 7 indexed citations

13.

Smith, John A., et al.. (1993). Water deficits: plant responses from cell to community.. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 212 indexed citations

14.

Wilson, Rob, et al.. (1990). Effect of Seeding Depth, Herbicide, and Variety on Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) Emergence, Vigor, and Yield. Weed Technology. 4(4). 739–742. 6 indexed citations

15.

Wilson, Rob & John A. Smith. (1987). Energy Requirements and the Effect of Rotary Tiller Configurations On Cyanazine Distribution on Ridges. Weed Technology. 1(4). 294–301. 3 indexed citations

16.

Smith, John A.. (1986). G86-782 Distribution of Crop Residue A Requirement for Conservation Tillage. Insecta mundi. 1 indexed citations

17.

Smith, John A. & M. W. Perry. (1980). Seeking more from rainfall with 2 tonne clubs.. 21(3). 96–99. 1 indexed citations

18.

Smith, John A., et al.. (1980). Energy Requirements of Selected Dryland Wheat Cropping Systems. Transactions of the ASAE. 23(4). 822–825. 8 indexed citations

19.

Smith, John A., et al.. (1965). Molybdenum increases cereal yields on wheatbelt scrubplain. Journal of the Department of Agriculture for Western Australia. 6(12). 699–703. 2 indexed citations

20.

Smith, John A., et al.. (1961). Spread super for cereal crops. Journal of the Department of Agriculture for Western Australia. 2(11). 869–870. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact