Johannes Gescher

4.0k total citations
109 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Johannes Gescher is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Johannes Gescher has authored 109 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 67 papers in Environmental Engineering, 39 papers in Molecular Biology and 33 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Johannes Gescher's work include Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation (67 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (31 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (16 papers). Johannes Gescher is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation (67 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (31 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (16 papers). Johannes Gescher collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Johannes Gescher's co-authors include Katrin Richter, Marcus Schicklberger, Sven Kerzenmacher, Gunnar Sturm, Harald Horn, Andreas Kappler, Sibylle Ziegler, Juraj Majzlan, Hermann Schägger and Georg Fuchs and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Johannes Gescher

108 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Johannes Gescher Germany 34 1.5k 967 778 717 483 109 3.1k
Shun’ichi Ishii Japan 28 1.5k 1.0× 551 0.6× 779 1.0× 400 0.6× 525 1.1× 54 2.5k
Maddalena V. Coppi United States 22 2.3k 1.6× 689 0.7× 814 1.0× 880 1.2× 274 0.6× 28 3.1k
Atsushi Kouzuma Japan 26 1.6k 1.1× 423 0.4× 999 1.3× 378 0.5× 412 0.9× 72 2.4k
Yue Zheng China 35 934 0.6× 493 0.5× 606 0.8× 646 0.9× 1.0k 2.1× 80 3.2k
Guoping Sun China 35 1.1k 0.7× 486 0.5× 611 0.8× 439 0.6× 1.1k 2.3× 120 3.5k
Abraham Esteve‐Núñez Spain 37 2.7k 1.9× 479 0.5× 1.4k 1.8× 727 1.0× 1.1k 2.3× 95 4.1k
Samantha B. Reed United States 17 1.5k 1.0× 624 0.6× 811 1.0× 408 0.6× 175 0.4× 18 2.3k
Xing Liu China 31 1.3k 0.9× 411 0.4× 565 0.7× 310 0.4× 393 0.8× 75 2.3k
Ching Leang United States 29 3.8k 2.6× 1.1k 1.1× 1.5k 1.9× 1.4k 1.9× 478 1.0× 37 5.1k
Anna Obraztsova United States 17 857 0.6× 460 0.5× 484 0.6× 437 0.6× 259 0.5× 33 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Johannes Gescher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johannes Gescher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johannes Gescher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johannes Gescher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johannes Gescher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johannes Gescher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johannes Gescher. The network helps show where Johannes Gescher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johannes Gescher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johannes Gescher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johannes Gescher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johannes Gescher. Johannes Gescher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Le, Natalie, et al.. (2025). Identification of factors limiting the efficiency of transplanting extracellular electron transfer chains in Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 91(6). e0068525–e0068525. 3 indexed citations
2.
Wallner, C., Dolores Díaz, Dirk Holtmann, et al.. (2025). Extracellular Bacterial Production of DNA Hydrogels–Toward Engineered Living Materials. Small. 21(19). e2502199–e2502199. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gescher, Johannes, et al.. (2024). Biofilms for Production of Chemicals and Energy. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 15(1). 361–387. 4 indexed citations
5.
Rosa, Luís F. M., et al.. (2024). Efficiency and process development for microbial biomass production using oxic bioelectrosynthesis. Trends in biotechnology. 43(3). 673–695. 2 indexed citations
6.
Gescher, Johannes, et al.. (2024). Magnetic, conductive nanoparticles as building blocks for steerable micropillar-structured anodic biofilms. Biofilm. 8. 100226–100226. 1 indexed citations
7.
Gescher, Johannes, et al.. (2023). A scalable, rotating disc bioelectrochemical reactor (RDBER) suitable for the cultivation of both cathodic and anodic biofilms. Bioresource Technology Reports. 21. 101357–101357. 12 indexed citations
8.
Gescher, Johannes, et al.. (2023). Predictability and robustness of anode biofilm to changing potential in microbial electrolysis system. Bioresource Technology Reports. 24. 101640–101640. 4 indexed citations
9.
Bühler, Katja, et al.. (2023). Beneficial applications of biofilms. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 22(5). 276–290. 51 indexed citations
10.
Gescher, Johannes, et al.. (2023). Gastropods as a source for fecal indicator bacteria in drinking water. Water Research. 244. 120494–120494. 2 indexed citations
11.
Wagner, Michael, et al.. (2022). Enrichment of phosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) in a microfluidic model biofilm system by mimicking a typical aerobic granular sludge feast/famine regime. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 106(3). 1313–1324. 12 indexed citations
12.
Rehnlund, David, et al.. (2022). Nanowired electrodes as outer membrane cytochrome-independent electronic conduit in Shewanella oneidensis. iScience. 25(2). 103853–103853. 3 indexed citations
13.
Dötsch, Andreas, Michael Hügler, Michael Wagner, et al.. (2020). From an extremophilic community to an electroautotrophic production strain: identifying a novel Knallgas bacterium as cathodic biofilm biocatalyst. The ISME Journal. 14(5). 1125–1140. 31 indexed citations
14.
Hu, Yong, et al.. (2020). Cultivation of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria in Conductive DNA Nanocomposite Hydrogels Yields a Programmable Biohybrid Materials System. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 12(13). 14806–14813. 34 indexed citations
16.
Krause, Susanne, Theo Peschke, Kersten S. Rabe, et al.. (2019). Machine-assisted cultivation and analysis of biofilms. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 8933–8933. 19 indexed citations
17.
Zengerle, Roland, et al.. (2018). Systematic investigation of anode materials for microbial fuel cells with the model organism G. sulfurreducens. Bioresource Technology Reports. 2. 29–37. 7 indexed citations
18.
Sturm, Gunnar, et al.. (2015). A dynamic periplasmic electron transfer network enables respiratory flexibility beyond a thermodynamic regulatory regime. The ISME Journal. 9(8). 1802–1811. 112 indexed citations
19.
Bierer, Benedikt, et al.. (2014). Characterization of microbial current production as a function of microbe–electrode-interaction. Bioresource Technology. 157. 284–292. 58 indexed citations
20.
Gescher, Johannes & Andreas Kappler. (2013). Microbial metal respiration : from geochemistry to potential applications. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026