Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Artificial Intelligence for Digital Heritage Innovation: Setting up a R&D Agenda for Europe
202428 citationsSander Münster, Ferdinand Maiwald et al.Heritageprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Oomen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Oomen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Oomen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Oomen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Oomen. The network helps show where Johan Oomen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan Oomen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan Oomen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan Oomen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Johan Oomen. Johan Oomen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Münster, Sander, et al.. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Digital Heritage Innovation: Setting up a R&D Agenda for Europe. Heritage. 7(2). 794–816.28 indexed citations breakdown →
Noordegraaf, Julia, et al.. (2017). FREEZE! A manifesto for safeguarding and preserving born-digital heritage.
4.
Ardissono, Liliana, Cristina Gena, Lora Aroyo, et al.. (2015). PATCH 2015. Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin). 447–449.3 indexed citations
5.
Oomen, Johan, et al.. (2014). Na de bevrijding XL: Expanding a Historical Television Series with Archival Sources.1 indexed citations
Oomen, Johan, et al.. (2012). D7.6.2. Online Access to Audiovisual Heritage Status Report.1 indexed citations
8.
Oomen, Johan, et al.. (2012). Sharing Cultural Heritage the Linked Open Data Way: Why You Should Sign Up. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).17 indexed citations
Erp, Marieke van, Johan Oomen, Lora Aroyo, et al.. (2011). Automatic Heritage Metadata Enrichment with Historic Events. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).10 indexed citations
Segers, Roxane, Marieke van Erp, Lourens van der Meij, et al.. (2011). Hacking History: Automatic Historical Event Extraction for Enriching Cultural Heritage Multimedia Collections !. VU Research Portal. 108–111.4 indexed citations
14.
Oomen, Johan, et al.. (2010). Emerging Practices in the Cultural Heritage Domain - Social Tagging of Audiovisual Heritage.16 indexed citations
Oomen, Johan, et al.. (2009). Television heritage and the semantic web: Video Active and EUscreen. International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. 97–105.
17.
Oomen, Johan, et al.. (2009). Special Issue on Information Access to Cultural Heritage. Texas Digital Library (University of Texas). 10(6).1 indexed citations
Oomen, Johan, et al.. (2005). The Davideon Project: Capitalizing the Possibilities of Streaming Video as Flexible Learning Objects for the Humanities. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 2(1). 1.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.