Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers
2010701 citationsMarc Calaf, Charles Meneveau et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Meyers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Meyers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Meyers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Meyers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Meyers. The network helps show where Johan Meyers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan Meyers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan Meyers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan Meyers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Johan Meyers. Johan Meyers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Allaerts, Dries & Johan Meyers. (2017). A fast wind-farm boundary-layer model to investigate gravity wave effects and upstream flow deceleration. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
12.
Owens, William H., et al.. (2011). Investigations Of Surface-Catalyzed Reactions In A Mars Mixture. ESASP. 692. 150.2 indexed citations
13.
Meneveau, Charles & Johan Meyers. (2010). Optimization of turbine spacing in the fully developed wind turbine array boundary layer. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 55(16).1 indexed citations
14.
Meneveau, Charles, Marc Calaf, & Johan Meyers. (2009). Large Eddy Simulation study of the fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layer. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 54(19).1 indexed citations
15.
Meyers, Johan, et al.. (2008). The effect of a cross-flow opening on the performance of a centrifugal fan in the cleaning section of a combine harvester..2 indexed citations
16.
Meyers, Johan & Pierre Sagaut. (2006). On the required Reynolds-number dependence of variational multi-scale Smagorinsky models. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 439.1 indexed citations
17.
Roeck, Wim De, et al.. (2005). A hybrid flow-acoustic prediction technique with application to 2D Cavity Flow Noise. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
18.
Hunter, William Wilson, et al.. (1981). Laser velocimetry technique applied to the Langley 0.3 meter transonic cryogenic tunnel. STIN. 81. 22331.12 indexed citations
19.
Meyers, Johan, et al.. (1978). Correlation of laser velocimeter measurements over a wing with results of two prediction techniques. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 78. 21410.1 indexed citations
20.
Meyers, Johan, et al.. (1973). Processing of the laser Doppler velocimeter signals. 20(1). 77–84.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.