Johan Defoor

535 citations
15 papers · 378 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Defoor

15 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Johan Defoor
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 155
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 247
  • Hematology 42
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 31
  • Cell Biology 36
Replace Alessandro Bruno with:
Alessandro Bruno Italy
Ricardo Martinez-Ruiz United States
William S. Foster Canada
Igor L. Gomes‐Santos Brazil
Xiaopeng Li China
Moshe Levin Israel
Farzad Izaddoustdar Canada
Aine Rice United Kingdom
Melanie Zwiener Germany
J G. Poole United States
Johan Defoor relative to Alessandro Bruno Italy Alessandro Bruno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Alessandro Bruno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Defoor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Defoor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Defoor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Defoor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Defoor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Defoor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Defoor. The network helps show where Johan Defoor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Defoor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Defoor Line = papers co-authored together Johan Defoor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200562
2 200457
3 200649
4 200639
5 200138
6 200035
7 200033
8 200025
9 200511
10 20119
11
The Caregene Study: ACE gene I/D polymorphism and effect of physical training on aerobic power in coronary artery disease.
20068
12 20057
13 20033
14
Effect of creatine supplementation in conjunction with exercise training on physical fitness in coronary artery disease.
20061
15 20001

About Johan Defoor

Johan Defoor is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Animal Science and Zoology, Rehabilitation and Nephrology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (9 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (6 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Genetics and Physical Performance (3 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (155 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (247 citations), Hematology (42 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (31 citations) and Cell Biology (36 citations). Johan Defoor has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Schepers, Luc Vanhees, Robert Fagard, Robert Fagard, A. Stevens, L. Vanhees, Frank Rademakers, Hein Heidbüchel, R. Fagard and Kathelijne Peerlinck. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, Blood, Journal of Hypertension, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and International Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026