Joel Rentzler
- Finance top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Martin J. GruberEdwin J. EltonRobert FergusonKenneth D. GarbadeJames L. BickslerKishore Tandon
- Topics
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (14 papers)Market Dynamics and Volatility (6 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Joel Rentzler
21 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Finance 390
- Economics and Econometrics 286
- Accounting 226
- Strategy and Management 95
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 75
Countries citing papers authored by Joel Rentzler
This map shows the geographic impact of Joel Rentzler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joel Rentzler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joel Rentzler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joel Rentzler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joel Rentzler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joel Rentzler. The network helps show where Joel Rentzler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joel Rentzler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joel Rentzler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joel Rentzler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joel Rentzler. Joel Rentzler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Trading Strategy on EVA and MVA: Are They Reliable Indicators of Future Stock Performance? | 3 |
| 3 | The Dependence of Upside Capture Ratios and Downside Capture Ratios on the Length of the Measurement Interval, Beta, and Alpha | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | Does Economic Value Added (EVA) Improve Stock Performance or Profitability | 21 |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Joel Rentzler
Joel Rentzler is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (14 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (6 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (390 citations), Accounting (226 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (286 citations). Joel Rentzler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. Gruber, Edwin J. Elton, Robert Ferguson, Kenneth D. Garbade, James L. Bicksler and Kishore Tandon. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Management Science and The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.