Joël Kuiper

15 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Joël Kuiper
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health Informatics 95
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 256
  • Artificial Intelligence 255
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 52
  • Information Systems and Management 34
Replace Sarah A. Elliott with:
Sarah A. Elliott Canada
Perrine Janiaud United States
Andrea Coravos United States
Beau Norgeot United States
Ignacio Atal France
Danielle Whicher United States
Anthony Solomonides United States
Shaikat Mondal India
Oscar A. Garcia Valencia United States
Seth Powsner United States
Joël Kuiper relative to Sarah A. Elliott Canada Sarah A. Elliott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Sarah A. Elliott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joël Kuiper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joël Kuiper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joël Kuiper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joël Kuiper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joël Kuiper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joël Kuiper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joël Kuiper. The network helps show where Joël Kuiper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joël Kuiper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joël Kuiper Line = papers co-authored together Joël Kuiper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2018281
2 2015182
3
Extracting PICO Sentences from Clinical Trial Reports using Supervised Distant Supervision.
201679
4 201657
5 201754
6 202043
7 201940
8 201538
9 201529
10 201420
11 201420
12
Crowdsourcing a Comprehensive Clinical Trial Repository
20142
13 20122
14 20151
15 20151

About Joël Kuiper

Joël Kuiper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management and Health Informatics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (4 papers), Topic Modeling (4 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (95 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (256 citations), Artificial Intelligence (255 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (52 citations) and Information Systems and Management (34 citations). Joël Kuiper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Iain Marshall, Byron Wallace, James Thomas, Anna H Noel-Storr, Edward A. Banner, Frank Soboczenski, Ruud F. Spee, Niels Peek, Hareld Kemps and Tom Vromen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Biopreservation and Biobanking, Human Mutation, International Journal of Cardiology and IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact