Joe Oliver

459 total citations
10 papers, 342 citations indexed

About

Joe Oliver is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Joe Oliver has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Joe Oliver's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). Joe Oliver is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). Joe Oliver collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Joe Oliver's co-authors include Stefan Priebe, Peter Huxley, W Kaiser, K. Bridges, David J. Knight, Cuihong Jia, Theo Hagg, Diego J. Rodriguez‐Gil, Eric Morris and Andrew A. Gage and has published in prestigious journals such as Stem Cells, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology and Child Care Health and Development.

In The Last Decade

Joe Oliver

8 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joe Oliver United Kingdom	5	218	140	129	72	68	10	342
Lise-Lotte Nilsson Sweden	9	203 0.9×	156 1.1×	112 0.9×	61 0.8×	97 1.4×	12	331
Birgitte Welcher Denmark	7	223 1.0×	154 1.1×	148 1.1×	49 0.7×	50 0.7×	8	329
Joseph Oliver United Kingdom	7	219 1.0×	154 1.1×	149 1.2×	59 0.8×	119 1.8×	10	387
Timo Harfst Germany	10	216 1.0×	263 1.9×	105 0.8×	64 0.9×	105 1.5×	27	446
Stefan Tungström Sweden	7	136 0.6×	166 1.2×	70 0.5×	31 0.4×	57 0.8×	13	295
T.G. Sriram India	9	155 0.7×	127 0.9×	111 0.9×	43 0.6×	88 1.3×	18	373
Denise Meuldijk Australia	9	101 0.5×	260 1.9×	102 0.8×	54 0.8×	75 1.1×	15	417
Matthias C. Angermeyer Germany	7	171 0.8×	209 1.5×	183 1.4×	21 0.3×	102 1.5×	13	398
Shazad Amin United Kingdom	7	411 1.9×	242 1.7×	117 0.9×	173 2.4×	30 0.4×	10	484
Chiyo Fujii Japan	10	140 0.6×	160 1.1×	91 0.7×	40 0.6×	73 1.1×	49	346

Countries citing papers authored by Joe Oliver

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joe Oliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe Oliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe Oliver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joe Oliver

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe Oliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe Oliver. The network helps show where Joe Oliver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joe Oliver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joe Oliver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joe Oliver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joe Oliver. Joe Oliver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Cox, Derek, Brian Wang, Joe Oliver, et al.. (2025). Stem cell CNTF promotes olfactory epithelial neuroregeneration and functional recovery following injury. Stem Cells. 43(8). 1 indexed citations

2.

Jia, Cuihong, et al.. (2020). Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase increases adult olfactory stem cell self-renewal and neuroregeneration through ciliary neurotrophic factor. Stem Cell Research. 49. 102061–102061. 9 indexed citations

3.

Hill, Jon & Joe Oliver. (2018). Acceptance and Commitment Coaching.

4.

Morris, Eric & Joe Oliver. (2009). ACT early: Acceptance and commitment therapy in early intervention in psychosis. Clinical Psychology Forum. 1(196). 27–31. 2 indexed citations

5.

Priebe, Stefan, et al.. (1999). Quality of Life and Mental Health Care. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 57 indexed citations

6.

Oliver, Joe, Peter Huxley, Stefan Priebe, & W Kaiser. (1997). Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 32(2). 76–83. 253 indexed citations

7.

Bridges, K., Peter Huxley, & Joe Oliver. (1994). Psychiatric Rehabilitation: Redefined for the 1990s. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 40(1). 1–16. 9 indexed citations

8.

Bridges, K., et al.. (1993). Changes in Social Support and Quality of Life: a Case Study of a Man With an Enduring Psychotic Illness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 39(2). 142–151. 6 indexed citations

9.

Oliver, Joe, Peter Huxley, & Alan Butler. (1989). Mental Health Casework: Illuminations and Reflections. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

10.

Oliver, Joe & David J. Knight. (1984). An evaluation of an inpatient psychiatric unit for children. Child Care Health and Development. 10(3). 141–155. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact