Jod Mehta

1.1k citations
18 papers · 549 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jod Mehta

17 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Jod Mehta
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ophthalmology 178
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 298
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 90
  • Epidemiology 56
  • Molecular Medicine 3
Replace Amir Faramarzi with:
Amir Faramarzi Iran
Şengül Özdek Türkiye
Wilhelmina J. Rijneveld Netherlands
Izak F Wessels United States
Carlton Fenzl United States
Anubha Rathi India
Jonathan B. Rubenstein United States
Alfred T.S. Leung Hong Kong
Sumitra S. Khandelwal United States
Jacqueline Beltz Australia
Jod Mehta relative to Amir Faramarzi Iran Amir Faramarzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Amir Faramarzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jod Mehta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jod Mehta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jod Mehta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jod Mehta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jod Mehta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jod Mehta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jod Mehta. The network helps show where Jod Mehta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jod Mehta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jod Mehta Line = papers co-authored together Jod Mehta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011156
2 2006113
3 200557
4 201438
5 201226
6 201225
7 201225
8 201124
9 201517
10 201215
11 201614
12 201311
13 201310
14 201710
15 20155
16 20122
17
An Engineering-based Methodology to Characterize the In Vivo Nonlinear Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea with Application to Glaucoma Subjects
20151
18 20230

About Jod Mehta

Jod Mehta is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ophthalmology, Social Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (10 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (1 paper) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (178 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (298 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (90 citations), Epidemiology (56 citations) and Molecular Medicine (3 citations). Jod Mehta has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Evans, Marcus Ang, Vishal Jhanji, Rasik B. Vajpayee, Namrata Sharma, Alvin L. Young, Tushar Agarwal, Frank Larkin, Mark Wilkins and Thulasiraj Ravilla. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical ophthalmology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Translational Vision Science & Technology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact