Jochem Hogenhuis
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Family Practice top 10%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Tiny JaarsmaDirk J. van VeldhuisenHans L. HillegeAdriaan A. VoorsNic J.G.M. VeegerMartje H.L. van der WalArno W. HoesFrans Boomsma
- Topics
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management (8 papers)Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Jochem Hogenhuis
9 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 304
- Epidemiology 61
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 52
- Family Practice 36
- Oncology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Jochem Hogenhuis
This map shows the geographic impact of Jochem Hogenhuis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochem Hogenhuis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochem Hogenhuis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jochem Hogenhuis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochem Hogenhuis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochem Hogenhuis. The network helps show where Jochem Hogenhuis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jochem Hogenhuis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jochem Hogenhuis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jochem Hogenhuis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jochem Hogenhuis. Jochem Hogenhuis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effect of moderate or intensive disease management program on outcome in patients with heart failure: Coordinating Study Evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in Heart Failure (COACH) | 15 |
| 2 | [Value of basic and intensive management of patients with heart failure; results of a randomised controlled clinical trial]. | 4 |
| 3 | 84 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 146 | |
| 9 | 1 |
About Jochem Hogenhuis
Jochem Hogenhuis is a scholar working on Family Practice, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Hematology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (8 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (36 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (304 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (15 citations). Jochem Hogenhuis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Tiny Jaarsma, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Hans L. Hillege, Adriaan A. Voors, Nic J.G.M. Veeger, Martje H.L. van der Wal, Arno W. Hoes, Frans Boomsma, Johannes A. Kragten and D.J. van Veldhuisen. Their work appears in journals such as American Heart Journal, European Journal of Heart Failure and International Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.