Jocelyne Wable
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 11
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 2
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 7
- Co-authors
- Christian Lorenzi (2 shared papers)John Ashburner (1 shared paper)R. S. J. Frackowiak (1 shared paper)Ingrid S. Johnsrude (1 shared paper)Andreas Kleinschmidt (1 shared paper)Anne‐Lise Giraud (1 shared paper)Lionel Collet (5 shared papers)Bruno Frachet (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Jocelyne Wable
11 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Sensory Systems 117
- Cognitive Neuroscience 388
- Speech and Hearing 41
- Neurology 44
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Jocelyne Wable
This map shows the geographic impact of Jocelyne Wable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jocelyne Wable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jocelyne Wable more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jocelyne Wable
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jocelyne Wable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jocelyne Wable. The network helps show where Jocelyne Wable may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jocelyne Wable, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 271 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 10 | Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees. | 2002 | 6 |
| 11 | 1996 | 3 |
About Jocelyne Wable
Jocelyne Wable is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Neurology, Speech and Hearing and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 11 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (2 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (1 paper) and Speech and Audio Processing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (117 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (388 citations), Speech and Hearing (41 citations), Neurology (44 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations). Jocelyne Wable has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Christian Lorenzi, John Ashburner, R. S. J. Frackowiak, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Anne‐Lise Giraud, Lionel Collet, Bruno Frachet, Sylviane Chéry-Croze and Stéphane Gallego. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Audiology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research, Acta Oto-Laryngologica and Neurocase.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.