Jocelyn Vine

568 total citations
10 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Jocelyn Vine is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jocelyn Vine has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Jocelyn Vine's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers). Jocelyn Vine is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers). Jocelyn Vine collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Jocelyn Vine's co-authors include Janet Curran, Victoria Rogers, Thomas Noseworthy, Alison M. Hutchinson, John N. Lavis, Jeremy Grimshaw, Janet E. Squires, Jamie Brehaut, Susan Michie and Ian D. Graham and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Implementation Science and Journal of Pediatric Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jocelyn Vine

10 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jocelyn Vine Canada	8	201	101	41	40	28	10	321
Alexandra B. Morshed United States	10	234 1.2×	121 1.2×	17 0.4×	72 1.8×	32 1.1×	19	343
Renée I. Boothroyd United States	8	323 1.6×	45 0.4×	40 1.0×	13 0.3×	19 0.7×	13	576
Emilie J. Gladstone Canada	12	147 0.7×	190 1.9×	71 1.7×	71 1.8×	29 1.0×	17	443
Thomas Mills United Kingdom	9	211 1.0×	43 0.4×	15 0.4×	32 0.8×	14 0.5×	25	335
Heidemarie Weber Switzerland	8	204 1.0×	103 1.0×	56 1.4×	11 0.3×	35 1.3×	13	321
Jim Elliott United Kingdom	9	269 1.3×	76 0.8×	22 0.5×	31 0.8×	24 0.9×	14	338
Dawn Ernstzen South Africa	10	187 0.9×	164 1.6×	13 0.3×	40 1.0×	31 1.1×	35	366
Samantha Chakraborty Australia	10	182 0.9×	110 1.1×	11 0.3×	78 1.9×	16 0.6×	35	364
Marla Oros United States	9	163 0.8×	153 1.5×	62 1.5×	14 0.3×	14 0.5×	20	367
Ismael Martínez Nicolás Spain	9	106 0.5×	59 0.6×	55 1.3×	25 0.6×	77 2.8×	25	303

Countries citing papers authored by Jocelyn Vine

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jocelyn Vine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jocelyn Vine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jocelyn Vine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jocelyn Vine

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jocelyn Vine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jocelyn Vine. The network helps show where Jocelyn Vine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jocelyn Vine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jocelyn Vine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jocelyn Vine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jocelyn Vine. Jocelyn Vine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Squires, Janet E., Alison M. Hutchinson, Mary Coughlin, et al.. (2021). Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-Country Analysis. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 11(8). 1373–1390. 20 indexed citations

Curran, Janet, et al.. (2020). Improving transitions in care for children with complex and medically fragile needs: a mixed methods study. BMC Pediatrics. 20(1). 219–219. 18 indexed citations

Squires, Janet E., Ian D. Graham, John N. Lavis, et al.. (2019). Understanding context: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75(12). 3448–3470. 30 indexed citations

Price, Sheri, et al.. (2019). Experiences With Managing the Workplace Social Environment. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 49(11). 569–573. 4 indexed citations

Squires, Janet E., Laura D. Aloisio, Jeremy Grimshaw, et al.. (2019). Attributes of context relevant to healthcare professionals’ use of research evidence in clinical practice: a multi-study analysis. Implementation Science. 14(1). 52–52. 67 indexed citations

Squires, Janet E., Ian D. Graham, Alison M. Hutchinson, et al.. (2015). Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol. Implementation Science. 10(1). 135–135. 59 indexed citations

Squires, Janet E., Ian D. Graham, Alison M. Hutchinson, et al.. (2014). Understanding context in knowledge translation: a concept analysis study protocol. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 71(5). 1146–1155. 28 indexed citations

Rogers, Victoria, et al.. (2013). Impact of Let's Go! 5-2-1-0: A Community-Based, Multisetting Childhood Obesity Prevention Program. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 38(9). 1010–1020. 73 indexed citations

Latimer, Margot, Philip L. Jackson, Céleste Johnston, & Jocelyn Vine. (2011). Examining Nurse Empathy for Infant Procedural Pain: Testing a New Video Measure. Pain Research and Management. 16(4). 228–233. 15 indexed citations

10.

Campbell‐Yeo, Marsha, et al.. (2007). Co-Bedding Twins. Nursing Research. 56(2). 137–143. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact