Joaquin Casanova

1.3k citations
44 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Joaquin Casanova

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Joaquin Casanova
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Environmental Engineering 219
  • Soil Science 112
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 579
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 53
  • Media Technology 72
Replace Debasmita Misra with:
Debasmita Misra United States
Mohammad Rahnama Iran
Thamer Ahmed Mohamed Malaysia
Qingliang Li China
Nitesh Gupta India
Arun Goel India
Amlan Das India
François Garnier France
Hongyu Li China
Xiaodong Liu China
Joaquin Casanova relative to Debasmita Misra United States Debasmita Misra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Debasmita Misra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joaquin Casanova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joaquin Casanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joaquin Casanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joaquin Casanova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joaquin Casanova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joaquin Casanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joaquin Casanova. The network helps show where Joaquin Casanova may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joaquin Casanova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joaquin Casanova Line = papers co-authored together Joaquin Casanova links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009188
2 2011133
3 200986
4 200982
5 200980
6 201354
7 201953
8 201048
9 201042
10 201337
11 201130
12 200129
13 201427
14 200826
15 201321
16 200717
17 200615
18 201013
19 201113
20 201213

About Joaquin Casanova

Joaquin Casanova is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Plant Science, Ocean Engineering and Atmospheric Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (18 papers), Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks (7 papers), Wireless Power Transfer Systems (7 papers), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (6 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (6 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (5 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (5 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (219 citations), Soil Science (112 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (579 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (53 citations) and Media Technology (72 citations). Joaquin Casanova has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include Jenshan Lin, Steven R. Evett, Robert C. Schwartz, J. A. Taylor, Lee Heng, Jasmeet Judge, Ryan Tseng, Lise Cary, Raul Andres Chinga and Catherine Guerrot. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Engineering in Agriculture, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Journal of Environmental Quality, IEEE Sensors Journal and Vadose Zone Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact