João Pinto-de-Sousa

1.0k total citations
51 papers, 784 citations indexed

About

João Pinto-de-Sousa is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, João Pinto-de-Sousa has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 784 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Surgery, 19 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 10 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in João Pinto-de-Sousa's work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (11 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (8 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (6 papers). João Pinto-de-Sousa is often cited by papers focused on Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (11 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (8 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (6 papers). João Pinto-de-Sousa collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Denmark and Germany. João Pinto-de-Sousa's co-authors include Leonor David, Amadeu Pimenta, Celso A. Reis, Raquel Almeida, Mário Seixas, Gil Faria, Ana Beatriz Almeida, J. Costa Maia, Joana Gomes and Catarina Gomes and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gut.

In The Last Decade

João Pinto-de-Sousa

46 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
João Pinto-de-Sousa Portugal 14 369 313 239 218 137 51 784
Shuhei Inoue Japan 15 192 0.5× 146 0.5× 230 1.0× 327 1.5× 125 0.9× 63 688
R. Shorthouse United States 18 275 0.7× 426 1.4× 121 0.5× 64 0.3× 208 1.5× 35 969
P. Dohrmann Germany 14 182 0.5× 193 0.6× 185 0.8× 301 1.4× 25 0.2× 46 761
Yoshitake Satomura Japan 16 140 0.4× 527 1.7× 327 1.4× 121 0.6× 39 0.3× 41 847
Xiaochuan Xu United States 9 299 0.8× 136 0.4× 105 0.4× 837 3.8× 107 0.8× 14 1.1k
Shu Soeda Japan 14 144 0.4× 86 0.3× 205 0.9× 84 0.4× 126 0.9× 67 702
Danielle F. Eytan United States 13 252 0.7× 184 0.6× 187 0.8× 101 0.5× 55 0.4× 29 654
Shinjiro Nagai Japan 14 203 0.6× 109 0.3× 230 1.0× 233 1.1× 86 0.6× 38 594
Yaning Yang China 13 210 0.6× 69 0.2× 362 1.5× 284 1.3× 137 1.0× 45 911
Massimo Berger Italy 15 130 0.4× 59 0.2× 220 0.9× 96 0.4× 104 0.8× 33 648

Countries citing papers authored by João Pinto-de-Sousa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of João Pinto-de-Sousa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by João Pinto-de-Sousa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites João Pinto-de-Sousa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by João Pinto-de-Sousa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by João Pinto-de-Sousa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by João Pinto-de-Sousa. The network helps show where João Pinto-de-Sousa may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of João Pinto-de-Sousa

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of João Pinto-de-Sousa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of João Pinto-de-Sousa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with João Pinto-de-Sousa. João Pinto-de-Sousa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Sousa, Paulo, et al.. (2024). An Unusual Coexistence: Right-Sided Colon Cancer and Intestinal Malrotation in an Adult. Cureus. 16(3). e55461–e55461. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fernandes, Urânia, et al.. (2023). Breast cancer in young women: a rising threat: A 5-year follow-up comparative study. Porto Biomedical Journal. 8(3). e213–e213. 12 indexed citations
4.
Pinto-de-Sousa, João, et al.. (2023). Giant peritoneal loose body: a challenging diagnosis in an asymptomatic patient. International Surgery Journal. 11(1). 126–128. 1 indexed citations
5.
Leal, Clara, et al.. (2023). Fournier Gangrene Management: Is a Stoma Mandatory?. Cureus. 15(5). e39450–e39450. 1 indexed citations
6.
Martins, Daniela, et al.. (2023). Jejunal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Strange Cause of Massive Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Cureus. 15(8). e43229–e43229. 2 indexed citations
7.
Fernandes, Urânia, et al.. (2022). Hernia of Landzert: a Rare Cause of Intestinal Obstruction. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 26(5). 1113–1114. 2 indexed citations
8.
Pereira, Ricardo, et al.. (2021). Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix with inguinal node metastases. Autopsy and Case Reports. 11. e2021335–e2021335. 1 indexed citations
9.
Gomes, Catarina, Andreia Almeida, Filipe Pinto, et al.. (2019). Carcinoembryonic antigen carrying SLeX as a new biomarker of more aggressive gastric carcinomas. Theranostics. 9(24). 7431–7446. 42 indexed citations
10.
Pinto-de-Sousa, João, et al.. (2017). Hérnia pulmonar intercostal encarcerada em contexto de trauma toraco-abdominal: Relato de caso e revisão da literatura. 41–46. 1 indexed citations
11.
Andrade, Paulo, et al.. (2017). Secondary peritonitis by Actinomyces odontolyticus. Porto Biomedical Journal. 2(5). 174–175. 6 indexed citations
12.
Freitas, Carla, et al.. (2016). Gastric wall ischemia following massive gastric distension due to peptic pyloric stenosis: a case report. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2016(2). rjw008–rjw008. 4 indexed citations
13.
Camilo, Vânia, Rita Barros, Ricardo Celestino, et al.. (2014). Immunohistochemical molecular phenotypes of gastric cancer based on SOX2 and CDX2 predict patient outcome. BMC Cancer. 14(1). 753–753. 32 indexed citations
14.
Faria, Gil, João Pinto-de-Sousa, John Preto, et al.. (2013). Three decades of clinical-pathological trends in gastric cancer: Prospective data from a Portuguese hospital. International Journal of Surgery. 11(6). 472–476. 8 indexed citations
15.
Pinto-de-Sousa, João, et al.. (2011). Brunner’s gland hyperplasia: an unusual cause of hemorrhagic shock. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2011(5). 2–2. 5 indexed citations
16.
Almeida, Ana Beatriz, et al.. (2011). Elevated serum C-reactive protein as a predictive factor for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. International Journal of Surgery. 10(2). 87–91. 99 indexed citations
17.
Pinto-de-Sousa, João, et al.. (2004). Clinicopathological significance and survival influence of p53 protein expression in gastric carcinoma. Histopathology. 44(4). 323–331. 28 indexed citations
18.
Pimenta, Amadeu, et al.. (2003). Mechanical digestive anastomosis: a new technique to make it easier, quicker and more reliable. Diseases of the Esophagus. 16(2). 126–129. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pinto-de-Sousa, João, Leonor David, Mário Seixas, & Amadeu Pimenta. (2001). Clinicopathologic Profiles and Prognosis of Gastric Carcinomas from the Cardia, Fundus/Body and Antrum. Digestive Surgery. 18(2). 102–110. 41 indexed citations
20.
Pinto-de-Sousa, João, et al.. (2001). Mucins MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6 expression in the evaluation of differentiation and clinico-biological behaviour of gastric carcinoma. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin. 440(3). 304–310. 84 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026