Joanne Stephen
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 6
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 5
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer survivorship and care 18
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 4
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 6
-
- Family Support in Illness 13
-
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life 8
-
- Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies 3
Joanne Stephen
36 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Applied Psychology 114
- Clinical Psychology 351
- Oncology 414
- Complementary and alternative medicine 101
- Social Psychology 241
Countries citing papers authored by Joanne Stephen
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne Stephen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne Stephen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne Stephen. The network helps show where Joanne Stephen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanne Stephen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 60 | |
| 20 | Patient navigation in cancer care: program delivery and research in British Columbia. | 2003 | 15 |
About Joanne Stephen
Joanne Stephen is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Oncology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (18 papers), Family Support in Illness (13 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers) and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (114 citations), Clinical Psychology (351 citations), Oncology (414 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (101 citations) and Social Psychology (241 citations). Joanne Stephen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael Speca, Linda E. Carlson, Rie Tamagawa, Richard Doll, James E. Marcia, Peter Faris, Lihong Zhong, Karen Fergus, Janine Giese‐Davis and Deborah McLeod. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Psycho-Oncology, Integrative Cancer Therapies, Journal of Palliative Care and Mindfulness.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.