Joanne Cacciatore

6.0k total citations
88 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Joanne Cacciatore is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joanne Cacciatore has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 83 papers in Clinical Psychology, 28 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 14 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Joanne Cacciatore's work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (80 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (36 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (19 papers). Joanne Cacciatore is often cited by papers focused on Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (80 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (36 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (19 papers). Joanne Cacciatore collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Joanne Cacciatore's co-authors include Kara Thieleman, J. Frederik Frøen, Ingela Rådestad, Vicki Flenady, Patricia Wilson, Jeffrey R. Lacasse, Peter Barr, John DeFrain, Jeremy Shiffman and Monir Islam and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Joanne Cacciatore

86 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joanne Cacciatore United States 32 2.5k 1.2k 532 525 461 88 3.1k
Heather Rowe Australia 29 1.1k 0.5× 1.5k 1.2× 660 1.2× 305 0.6× 624 1.4× 123 2.7k
Amanda Cooklin Australia 31 875 0.3× 1.2k 1.0× 383 0.7× 646 1.2× 259 0.6× 83 2.3k
Robert Tatelbaum United States 12 1.3k 0.5× 755 0.6× 678 1.3× 410 0.8× 250 0.5× 15 2.5k
Jeanne L. Alhusen United States 30 1.1k 0.4× 1.0k 0.9× 661 1.2× 702 1.3× 492 1.1× 63 2.6k
Priscilla K. Coleman United States 24 1.7k 0.7× 1.2k 1.0× 463 0.9× 588 1.1× 367 0.8× 47 3.0k
Anna Sarkadi Sweden 27 1.2k 0.5× 663 0.5× 464 0.9× 714 1.4× 111 0.2× 137 2.8k
Kimberly Sidora United States 9 1.2k 0.5× 532 0.4× 360 0.7× 358 0.7× 128 0.3× 12 2.1k
Patricia Hughes United Kingdom 25 1.3k 0.5× 1.0k 0.8× 539 1.0× 300 0.6× 474 1.0× 58 2.0k
Jon Korfmacher United States 19 1.2k 0.5× 538 0.4× 283 0.5× 241 0.5× 107 0.2× 44 1.8k
Hind Khalifeh United Kingdom 19 1.2k 0.5× 902 0.7× 314 0.6× 497 0.9× 289 0.6× 26 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Joanne Cacciatore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne Cacciatore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne Cacciatore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne Cacciatore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne Cacciatore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne Cacciatore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne Cacciatore. The network helps show where Joanne Cacciatore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanne Cacciatore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanne Cacciatore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanne Cacciatore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanne Cacciatore. Joanne Cacciatore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cacciatore, Joanne, Richard Gorman, Kara Thieleman, & Mariah Sullivan. (2024). “I Don’t Feel Judged. I Just Feel Love”: Perceptions of Animals as Support for Grievers. Society and Animals. 33(5-6). 607–625. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Thieleman, Kara, Joanne Cacciatore, & Allen Frances. (2023). Rates of Prolonged Grief Disorder: Considering relationship to the person who died and cause of death. Journal of Affective Disorders. 339. 832–837. 25 indexed citations
4.
Thieleman, Kara, et al.. (2022). Impairing Social Connectedness: The Dangers of Treating Grief With Naltrexone. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 63(3). 267–275. 6 indexed citations
5.
Gorman, Richard & Joanne Cacciatore. (2022). Exploring the Effects of the Human–Animal Relationship on Care-Farms in the Context of Trauma Histories. Anthrozoös. 36(2). 163–177. 4 indexed citations
6.
Sullivan, Mariah, Jennifer Huberty, Jeni Green, & Joanne Cacciatore. (2022). Adding a Facebook Support Group to an Online Yoga Randomized Trial for Women Who Have Experienced Stillbirth: A Feasibility Study. Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. 28(2). 179–187. 3 indexed citations
7.
Cacciatore, Joanne, et al.. (2020). What bereaved parents want health care providers to know when their babies are stillborn: a community-based participatory study. BMC Psychology. 8(1). 18–18. 24 indexed citations
8.
Huberty, Jennifer, Jeni Green, Katherine J. Gold, Jenn A. Leiferman, & Joanne Cacciatore. (2019). An iterative design process to develop a randomized feasibility study and inform recruitment of minority women after stillbirth. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 5(1). 140–140. 6 indexed citations
10.
Cacciatore, Joanne & Kara Thieleman. (2018). Normal Complications and Abnormal Assumptions After Perinatal Death. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 44(1). 6–12. 8 indexed citations
11.
Huberty, Jennifer, J. L. Matthews, Jenn A. Leiferman, Joanne Cacciatore, & Katherine J. Gold. (2017). A study protocol of a three-group randomized feasibility trial of an online yoga intervention for mothers after stillbirth (The Mindful Health Study). Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 4(1). 12–12. 10 indexed citations
12.
Burden, Christy, Stephanie Bradley, Claire Storey, et al.. (2016). . Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 241 indexed citations
13.
Cacciatore, Joanne & John DeFrain. (2015). The world of bereavement : cultural perspectives on death in families. Springer eBooks. 9 indexed citations
14.
Cacciatore, Joanne, et al.. (2014). Braving Human Suffering: Death Education and its Relationship to Empathy and Mindfulness. Social Work Education. 34(1). 91–109. 30 indexed citations
15.
Cacciatore, Joanne, et al.. (2014). Best practice in bereavement photography after perinatal death: qualitative analysis with 104 parents. BMC Psychology. 2(1). 15–15. 34 indexed citations
16.
Lacasse, Jeffrey R. & Joanne Cacciatore. (2014). Prescribing of Psychiatric Medication to Bereaved Parents Following Perinatal/Neonatal Death: An Observational Study. Death Studies. 38(9). 589–596. 26 indexed citations
17.
Cacciatore, Joanne, et al.. (2012). “I'll Never Forget Those Cold Words as Long as I Live”: Parent Perceptions of Death Notification for Stillbirth. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care. 8(4). 339–355. 31 indexed citations
18.
Lietz, Cynthia A., Jeffrey R. Lacasse, & Joanne Cacciatore. (2011). Social Support in Family Reunification: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Family Social Work. 14(1). 3–20. 32 indexed citations
19.
Cacciatore, Joanne. (2009). The Silent Birth: A Feminist Perspective. Social Work. 54(1). 91–95. 12 indexed citations
20.
Cacciatore, Joanne. (2007). A phenomenological exploration of stillbirth and the effects of ritualization on maternal anxiety and depression. Insecta mundi. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026