Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Anisotropic 3D full-waveform inversion
2013335 citationsM. Warner, A. Ratcliffe et al.Geophysicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanna Morgan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanna Morgan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanna Morgan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanna Morgan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanna Morgan. The network helps show where Joanna Morgan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanna Morgan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanna Morgan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanna Morgan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joanna Morgan. Joanna Morgan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wittmann, A., Matthijs C. van Soest, K. V. Hodges, et al.. (2018). Petrology and Radioisotopic Ages of Allanite in the Peak Ring of the Chicxulub Impact Crater. 2067. 6286.
Rae, Auriol S. P., Joanna Morgan, G. S. Collins, et al.. (2017). Deformation, Shock Barometry, and Porosity Within Shocked Target Rocks of the Chicxulub Peak Ring: Results from IODP-ICDP Expedition 364.. LPI. 1934.1 indexed citations
Sato, Honami, Akira Ishikawa, L. Ferrière, Joanna Morgan, & S. P. S. Gulick. (2017). Highly siderophile elements and Os isotope signatures in the K-Pg transition of the Chicxulub peak-ring rocks. Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology). 2017.1 indexed citations
13.
Whalen, Michael T., et al.. (2017). Facies and Ichnofabrics in the Paleocene of Chicxulub: A Record of the Recovery of Life Post-Impact. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1348.1 indexed citations
14.
Morgan, Joanna, et al.. (2017). High-Resolution Imaging of the Chicxulub Impact Basin. LPI. 1318.
15.
Christeson, Gail, Catalina Gebhardt, S. P. S. Gulick, et al.. (2017). Unusual Physical Properties of the Chicxulub Crater Peak Ring: Results from IODP/ICDP Expedition 364. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017.1 indexed citations
16.
Rae, Auriol S. P., Joanna Morgan, G. S. Collins, G. R. Osinski, & R. A. F. Grieve. (2015). Observational Constraints on Structural Uplift Formation: The West Clearwater Impact Structure. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1451.1 indexed citations
17.
Morgan, Joanna, S. P. S. Gulick, J. Urrutia‐Fucugauchi, et al.. (2015). IODP-ICDP Expedition 364: Drilling the K-Pg Impact Structure. LPI. 1747.3 indexed citations
18.
Warner, M., A. Ratcliffe, Tenice Nangoo, et al.. (2013). Anisotropic 3D full-waveform inversion. Geophysics. 78(2). R59–R80.335 indexed citations breakdown →
Morgan, Joanna. (1970). Bird movements in the Brisbane suburb of Belmont. 1(4). 100.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.