Joanna Blackwell
About
In The Last Decade
Joanna Blackwell
5 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Sociology and Political Science 69
- Gender Studies 35
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 24
- Social Psychology 21
- Economics and Econometrics 20
Countries citing papers authored by Joanna Blackwell
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanna Blackwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanna Blackwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanna Blackwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanna Blackwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanna Blackwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanna Blackwell. The network helps show where Joanna Blackwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanna Blackwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanna Blackwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanna Blackwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanna Blackwell. Joanna Blackwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 97 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.