Joan Braley
About
In The Last Decade
Joan Braley
5 papers receiving 61 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Immunology 46
- Infectious Diseases 21
- Health 20
- Genetics 17
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Joan Braley
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Braley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Braley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Braley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Braley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Braley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Braley. The network helps show where Joan Braley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan Braley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan Braley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan Braley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan Braley. Joan Braley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 43 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | FeLV and FIV: survey shows prevalence in the United States and Europe. | 14 |
| 5 | The National FeLV/FIV Awareness Project | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.