Joakim Krook

1.8k total citations
57 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Joakim Krook is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Building and Construction and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Joakim Krook has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 30 papers in Building and Construction and 15 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Joakim Krook's work include Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (31 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (20 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (14 papers). Joakim Krook is often cited by papers focused on Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (31 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (20 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (14 papers). Joakim Krook collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Belgium and Germany. Joakim Krook's co-authors include Mats Eklund, Niclas Svensson, Nils Johansson, Anders Mårtensson, Leenard Baas, Björn Berglund, David Laner, Steven Van Passel, Oliver Cencic and Dick Magnusson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Technology and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Joakim Krook

55 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joakim Krook Sweden 20 867 494 255 156 129 57 1.3k
Niclas Svensson Sweden 18 521 0.6× 367 0.7× 157 0.6× 107 0.7× 130 1.0× 52 1.1k
James W. Levis United States 21 919 1.1× 340 0.7× 101 0.4× 84 0.5× 153 1.2× 36 1.7k
Yong-Chul Jang South Korea 25 1.2k 1.4× 346 0.7× 426 1.7× 138 0.9× 217 1.7× 67 2.1k
Stefan Salhofer Austria 24 1.5k 1.8× 678 1.4× 391 1.5× 74 0.5× 361 2.8× 46 2.3k
Jun Nakatani Japan 21 482 0.6× 197 0.4× 143 0.6× 92 0.6× 227 1.8× 81 1.3k
Julie Clavreul Denmark 15 1.3k 1.4× 557 1.1× 148 0.6× 86 0.6× 208 1.6× 26 2.0k
Regina Mambeli Barros Brazil 25 668 0.8× 459 0.9× 171 0.7× 250 1.6× 47 0.4× 106 1.8k
Emmanuel Gentil Denmark 8 1.3k 1.5× 535 1.1× 95 0.4× 62 0.4× 163 1.3× 13 1.7k
Dongjie Niu China 21 653 0.8× 388 0.8× 118 0.5× 306 2.0× 54 0.4× 57 1.8k
Shijiang Xiao China 19 615 0.7× 135 0.3× 382 1.5× 119 0.8× 131 1.0× 41 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Joakim Krook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joakim Krook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joakim Krook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joakim Krook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joakim Krook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joakim Krook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joakim Krook. The network helps show where Joakim Krook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joakim Krook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joakim Krook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joakim Krook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joakim Krook. Joakim Krook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Johansson, Nils & Joakim Krook. (2021). How to handle the policy conflict between resource circulation and hazardous substances in the use of waste?. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 25(4). 994–1008. 19 indexed citations
2.
Krook, Joakim. (2021). Enhanced landfill mining, concept and challenges. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
3.
Vollprecht, Daniel, Roland Pomberger, Bernd Friedrich, et al.. (2019). INTEGRATION OF RESOURCE RECOVERY INTO CURRENT WASTE MANAGEMENT THROUGH (ENHANCED) LANDFILL MINING. Detritus. Volume 08 - December 2019(0). 1–1. 17 indexed citations
4.
Krook, Joakim, et al.. (2019). GUIDING FUTURE RESEARCH ON THE VALORISATION OF SHREDDER FINE RESIDUES: A REVIEW OF FOUR DECADES OF RESEARCH. Detritus. 150–164. 4 indexed citations
5.
Johansson, Nils, Joakim Krook, & Mats Eklund. (2017). The institutional capacity for a resource transition—A critical review of Swedish governmental commissions on landfill mining. Environmental Science & Policy. 70. 46–53. 25 indexed citations
6.
Krook, Joakim, et al.. (2016). Urks and the Urban Subsurface as Geosocial Formation. Science Technology & Human Values. 41(5). 827–848. 6 indexed citations
7.
Johansson, Nils, et al.. (2016). A new dawn for buried garbage? An investigation of the marketability of previously disposed shredder waste. Waste Management. 60. 417–427. 19 indexed citations
8.
Magnusson, Dick, et al.. (2015). The economic conditions for urban infrastructure mining: Using GIS to prospect hibernating copper stocks. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 103. 85–97. 28 indexed citations
9.
Krook, Joakim, et al.. (2015). Urban infrastructure mines: on the economic and environmental motives of cable recovery from subsurface power grids. Journal of Cleaner Production. 104. 353–363. 15 indexed citations
10.
Krook, Joakim, et al.. (2013). Resource and Climate Implications of Landfill Mining. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 17(5). 742–755. 26 indexed citations
11.
Johansson, Nils, et al.. (2013). A Cable Laid Is a Cable Played: On the Hibernation Logic behind Urban Infrastructure Mines. Journal of Urban Technology. 20(3). 85–103. 14 indexed citations
12.
Krook, Joakim, Niclas Svensson, & Britt‐Marie Steenari. (2012). Potential metal resources in waste incineration ash deposits. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 29(6). e70026–e70026. 1 indexed citations
13.
Krook, Joakim, et al.. (2012). A novel approach for environmental evaluation of landfill mining. Journal of Cleaner Production. 55. 24–34. 77 indexed citations
14.
Krook, Joakim, Niclas Svensson, & Mats Eklund. (2011). Landfill mining: A critical review of two decades of research. Waste Management. 32(3). 513–520. 276 indexed citations
15.
Krook, Joakim, et al.. (2010). Landfill mining : a review of three decades of research. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 2 indexed citations
16.
Svensson, Niclas, et al.. (2010). Introducing an approach to access environmental pressures from integrated remediation and landfill mining. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
17.
Krook, Joakim. (2010). Urban mining: prospecting for metals in the invisible city. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 5 indexed citations
18.
Engkvist, Inga‐Lill, Jörgen Eklund, Joakim Krook, et al.. (2009). Joint investigation of working conditions, environmental and system performance at recycling centres – Development of instruments and their usage. Applied Ergonomics. 41(3). 336–346. 13 indexed citations
19.
Krook, Joakim, Anders Mårtensson, & Mats Eklund. (2007). Evaluating waste management strategies—A case of metal-contaminated waste wood. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 52(1). 103–118. 22 indexed citations
20.
Krook, Joakim, Anders Mårtensson, & Mats Eklund. (2006). Preservative-treated sawn timber in Sweden: waste beyond control. Progress in Industrial Ecology An International Journal. 3(5). 471–471. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026