Joachim Peer
Impact in
-
- Crystallography and molecular interactions
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Semantic Web and Ontologies 3
- Cryptography and Data Security 2
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 1
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 1
- Security and Verification in Computing 1
-
- Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services 3
- Co-authors
- Paul E. Blower (1 shared paper)Charles E. Watson (1 shared paper)Alan H. Lipkus (1 shared paper)Daniel Olmedilla (3 shared papers)Piero A. Bonatti (3 shared papers)Claudiu Duma (2 shared papers)Grigoris Antoniou (2 shared papers)Cristina Baroglio (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences (1 paper)International Semantic Web Conference (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Switzerland
In The Last Decade
Joachim Peer
7 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 61
- Management Information Systems 50
- Information Systems 126
- Artificial Intelligence 119
- Inorganic Chemistry 49
Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Peer
This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Peer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Peer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Peer. The network helps show where Joachim Peer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 157 | |
| 2 | Web Service Composition as AI Planning { a Survey ⁄ | 2005 | 109 |
| 3 | Semantic Service Markup with SESMA | 2005 | 11 |
| 4 | Advanced Policy Explanations on the Web | 2006 | 11 |
| 5 | Rule-based Policy Specification : State of the Art and Future Work | 2004 | 9 |
| 6 | A Logic Programming Approach to RDF Document and Query Transformation. | 2002 | 4 |
| 7 | The REWERSE View on Policies | 2005 | 3 |
About Joachim Peer
Joachim Peer is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications and Management Information Systems, having authored 7 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Access Control and Trust (3 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (3 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (2 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (2 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (1 paper), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1 paper) and Security and Verification in Computing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (61 citations), Management Information Systems (50 citations), Information Systems (126 citations), Artificial Intelligence (119 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (49 citations). Joachim Peer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Blower, Charles E. Watson, Alan H. Lipkus, Daniel Olmedilla, Piero A. Bonatti, Claudiu Duma, Grigoris Antoniou, Cristina Baroglio, Alberto Martelli and Norbert E. Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences and International Semantic Web Conference.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.