Joachim Müller

3.7k total citations
94 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Joachim Müller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Joachim Müller has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 29 papers in Otorhinolaryngology and 25 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Joachim Müller's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (50 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (29 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (25 papers). Joachim Müller is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (50 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (29 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (25 papers). Joachim Müller collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Joachim Müller's co-authors include J. Helms, Franz Schön, Wafaa Shehata-Dieler, Berthold Koletzko, Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner, Rudolf Hagen, John‐Martin Hempel, Robert Mlynski, John Martin Hempel and Kathleen H. Makielski and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, CHEST Journal and Journal of neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Joachim Müller

87 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joachim Müller Germany 23 1.1k 691 485 385 237 94 1.7k
Daniel M. Zeitler United States 20 755 0.7× 932 1.3× 362 0.7× 316 0.8× 174 0.7× 60 1.7k
A. Robier France 18 612 0.6× 511 0.7× 381 0.8× 309 0.8× 225 0.9× 61 1.2k
Benno Weber Germany 19 867 0.8× 617 0.9× 467 1.0× 198 0.5× 190 0.8× 43 1.3k
David R. Friedland United States 24 610 0.6× 617 0.9× 384 0.8× 272 0.7× 265 1.1× 93 1.6k
D. Bouccara France 24 816 0.8× 683 1.0× 405 0.8× 370 1.0× 238 1.0× 119 1.9k
Maura K. Cosetti United States 18 465 0.4× 397 0.6× 309 0.6× 128 0.3× 301 1.3× 104 1.2k
J. C. Cooper United States 15 625 0.6× 520 0.8× 394 0.8× 397 1.0× 88 0.4× 25 1.4k
Jean‐Pierre Bébéar France 20 590 0.6× 451 0.7× 541 1.1× 300 0.8× 449 1.9× 61 1.6k
Demin Han China 22 306 0.3× 199 0.3× 438 0.9× 181 0.5× 521 2.2× 99 1.3k
Carlton J. Zdanski United States 21 610 0.6× 750 1.1× 326 0.7× 136 0.4× 303 1.3× 84 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Müller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Müller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Müller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Müller. The network helps show where Joachim Müller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joachim Müller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joachim Müller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joachim Müller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joachim Müller. Joachim Müller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schreier, Andrea, et al.. (2024). Individualized cochlear implantation – first experience with a new 34 mm electrode for patients with very long cochleae. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 103(S 02). S269–S269.
2.
Müller, Joachim, et al.. (2024). Aktuelle Trends und Entwicklungen bei der Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung. Sprache · Stimme · Gehör. 48(1). 22–31.
3.
Sharaf, Kariem, Andrea Schreier, Martin Canis, et al.. (2024). Revisions after prior stapes surgery: aspects on indication, intraoperative findings and surgical strategies. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 282(3). 1257–1269. 1 indexed citations
4.
Müller, Joachim, et al.. (2024). ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 281(7). 3461–3473. 1 indexed citations
5.
Polák, Marek, et al.. (2023). Intra-operative test electrode and electrical auditory brainstem response after preoperative assessment in cochlear implant candidacy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 725–728. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Zernotti, Máximo, et al.. (2022). Late complication of cochlear implantation: Necrotizing meningoencephalitis. Acta Otorrinolaringologica (English Edition). 73(1). 61–63. 1 indexed citations
8.
Zernotti, Máximo, et al.. (2021). Complicación tardía de implante coclear: meningoencefalitis necrosante. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española. 73(1). 61–63. 1 indexed citations
9.
Pongratz, Thomas, et al.. (2017). Laser‐assisted fixation of a nitinol stapes prosthesis. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 50(2). 153–157. 6 indexed citations
10.
Kisser, Ulrich, Birgit Ertl‐Wagner, John Martin Hempel, et al.. (2014). High-resolution computed tomography-based length assessments of the cochlea – an accuracy evaluation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 134(10). 1011–1015. 10 indexed citations
11.
Baumgartner, Wolf‐Dieter, K. Böheim, Rudolf Hagen, et al.. (2010). The Vibrant Soundbridge for Conductive and Mixed Hearing Losses: European Multicenter Study Results. Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. 69. 38–50. 102 indexed citations
12.
Brill, Stefan, Joachim Müller, Rudolf Hagen, et al.. (2009). Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 8(1). 40–40. 56 indexed citations
13.
Biller, Armin, et al.. (2007). Neuroradiologische Diagnostik bei Patienten mit sensorineuralem Hörverlust vor Cochlea-Implantation. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 179(9). 901–913. 4 indexed citations
14.
Brockmeier, Steffi Johanna, Mattheus Vischer, Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner, et al.. (2007). Comparison of Musical Activities of Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech-Coding Strategies. Ear and Hearing. 28(2). 49S–51S. 20 indexed citations
15.
Müller, Joachim. (2006). Workflow-based Integration: Grundlagen, Technologien, Management (Xpert.press). Springer eBooks.
16.
Baumgartner, Wolf‐Dieter, Constantino Morera, Wolfgang Gstöttner, et al.. (2006). Outcomes in adults implanted with the FLEX soft electrode. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 127(6). 579–586. 51 indexed citations
17.
Müller, Joachim. (2005). Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.. PubMed Central. 4. Doc04–Doc04. 1 indexed citations
18.
Dettling, Michael, Larry M. Gentilello, Wolfgang Kox, et al.. (2004). Gender Differences in Performance of a Computerized Version of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in Subcritically Injured Patients Who Are Admitted to the Emergency Department. Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering.
19.
Völter, Christiane, et al.. (2000). Innenohrdepression nach Mittelohreingriffen1. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 79(5). 260–265. 8 indexed citations
20.
Hofmann, Erich, et al.. (1999). Noninvasive direct stimulation of the cochlear nerve for functional MR imaging of the auditory cortex.. PubMed Central. 20(10). 1970–2. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel M. Zeitler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Robier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benno Weber Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David R. Friedland Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. Bouccara Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maura K. Cosetti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. C. Cooper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean‐Pierre Bébéar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Demin Han Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carlton J. Zdanski
Rankless by CCL
2026