Joachim Bæch

24 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Joachim Bæch
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Hematology 115
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 163
  • Oncology 118
  • Genetics 42
  • Neurology 55
Replace Guido Gini with:
Guido Gini Italy
Ombretta Annibali Italy
Cécile Borel France
Francesco Grimaldi Italy
Guro Løvik Goll Norway
Jong Hyung Yoon South Korea
St. Müller-Weihrich Germany
Jessica Hochberg United States
Michael M. Schündeln Germany
Irfan Maghfoor Saudi Arabia
Joachim Bæch relative to Guido Gini Italy Guido Gini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Guido Gini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Bæch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Bæch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Bæch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Bæch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Bæch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Bæch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Bæch. The network helps show where Joachim Bæch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Bæch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim Bæch Line = papers co-authored together Joachim Bæch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201884
2 201470
3 201858
4 201844
5 201229
6 199923
7 199716
8 202014
9 202311
10 202311
11 20029
12 20227
13 20226
14 20234
15 20034
16 20233
17 20232
18 20222
19
Internal hernias. Case report.
19891
20 20221

About Joachim Bæch

Joachim Bæch is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (8 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (4 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (115 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (163 citations), Oncology (118 citations), Genetics (42 citations) and Neurology (55 citations). Joachim Bæch has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tarec Christoffer El‐Galaly, Diego Villa, Chan Y. Cheah, Lars Christian Gormsen, Andrea Lo, Rudi Steffensen, Hans Erik Johnsen, Kirsten Nikolajsen, Kim Varming and Maja Bech Juul. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Haematology, Blood Advances, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, European Journal of Cancer and The Lancet Haematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact