J.M.H. Fortuin

1.4k total citations
53 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

J.M.H. Fortuin is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J.M.H. Fortuin has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 17 papers in Computational Mechanics and 13 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in J.M.H. Fortuin's work include Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (20 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (8 papers) and Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (8 papers). J.M.H. Fortuin is often cited by papers focused on Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (20 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (8 papers) and Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (8 papers). J.M.H. Fortuin collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. J.M.H. Fortuin's co-authors include P.J. Hamersma, J. Hart, W. J. Blok, Jacob Krüger, J. Ellenberger, Johan J. Heiszwolf, Kees Booij, Costin Sorin Bîldea and John Hart and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytica Chimica Acta, Chemical Engineering Science and AIChE Journal.

In The Last Decade

J.M.H. Fortuin

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J.M.H. Fortuin Netherlands	19	582	388	268	177	154	53	1.1k
Robert L. Pigford United States	23	520 0.9×	564 1.5×	428 1.6×	99 0.6×	264 1.7×	58	1.5k
Terukatsu Miyauchi Japan	21	893 1.5×	606 1.6×	507 1.9×	161 0.9×	164 1.1×	95	1.6k
J. Bertrand France	25	905 1.6×	425 1.1×	701 2.6×	208 1.2×	95 0.6×	67	2.2k
Yoshifumi Takaishi Japan	7	284 0.5×	360 0.9×	279 1.0×	150 0.8×	62 0.4×	24	1.0k
Shantanu Roy India	21	588 1.0×	354 0.9×	685 2.6×	261 1.5×	209 1.4×	47	1.3k
Kosei Oguchi Japan	8	321 0.6×	342 0.9×	234 0.9×	73 0.4×	70 0.5×	18	1.0k
Hans-Joachim Kretzschmar Germany	10	409 0.7×	545 1.4×	395 1.5×	123 0.7×	143 0.9×	22	1.6k
B. J. McCoy United States	19	506 0.9×	287 0.7×	215 0.8×	43 0.2×	196 1.3×	82	1.3k
Alfred Kruse Germany	4	260 0.4×	354 0.9×	258 1.0×	73 0.4×	66 0.4×	10	990
R. B. Evans United States	12	215 0.4×	272 0.7×	238 0.9×	113 0.6×	339 2.2×	20	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by J.M.H. Fortuin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M.H. Fortuin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M.H. Fortuin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M.H. Fortuin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M.H. Fortuin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M.H. Fortuin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M.H. Fortuin. The network helps show where J.M.H. Fortuin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.M.H. Fortuin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.M.H. Fortuin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.M.H. Fortuin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.M.H. Fortuin. J.M.H. Fortuin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Fortuin, J.M.H., Johan J. Heiszwolf, & Costin Sorin Bîldea. (2001). Design procedure for safe operations in agitated batch reactors. AIChE Journal. 47(4). 920–928. 2 indexed citations

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1996). Waves and Instabilities in Inclined Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow. 163–170. 3 indexed citations

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1996). Transient Gas-Liquid Flow in Upward Sloping Pipes, Approaching the Wavy-to-Slug Flow Transition. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 118(4). 729–735. 4 indexed citations

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1996). Wavy‐to‐slug flow transition in slightly inclined gas–liquid pipe flow. AIChE Journal. 42(4). 901–909. 17 indexed citations

Hamersma, P.J., et al.. (1992). The enhancement of the gas-absorption rate in agitated slurry reactors due to the adhesion of gas-adsorbing particles to gas bubbles. Chemical Engineering Science. 47(13-14). 3589–3596. 12 indexed citations

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1991). Experiments verify predictions of condensate movements. Oil & gas journal. 89(4). 91–93. 1 indexed citations

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1991). CALCULATIONS PREDICT CONDENSATE MOVEMENT AT T JUNCTIONS. Oil & gas journal. 89(3). 37–40. 2 indexed citations

Hamersma, P.J., et al.. (1991). Adhesion of small catalyst particles to gas bubbles: determination of small effective solid—liquid—gas contact angles. Chemical Engineering Science. 46(10). 2497–2506. 30 indexed citations

Hart, J., P.J. Hamersma, & J.M.H. Fortuin. (1991). A model for predicting liquid route preference during gas—liquid flow through horizontal branched pipelines. Chemical Engineering Science. 46(7). 1609–1622. 35 indexed citations

10.

Fortuin, J.M.H., J. Hart, & P.J. Hamersma. (1990). Route selectivity for gas‐liquid flow in horizontal T junctions. AIChE Journal. 36(5). 805–808. 6 indexed citations

11.

Hamersma, P.J., et al.. (1990). Phase Distribution During Gas/Liquid Flow Through Horizontal Dividing T Junctions. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 1 indexed citations

12.

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1990). Theory and experiments concerning the stability of a reacting system in a CSTR. AIChE Journal. 36(6). 961–965. 8 indexed citations

13.

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1986). Experimental verification of a model describing large temperature oscillations of a limit-cycle approaching liquid-phase reaction system in a CSTR. Chemical Engineering Science. 41(5). 1291–1302. 13 indexed citations

14.

Ellenberger, J. & J.M.H. Fortuin. (1985). A criterion for purely tangential laminar flow in the cone-and-plate rheometer and the parallel-plate rheometer. Chemical Engineering Science. 40(1). 111–116. 21 indexed citations

15.

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1984). Enhancement of absorption of a gas into a stagnant liquid in which a heterogeneously catalysed chemical reaction occurs. Chemical Engineering Science. 39(9). 1415–1422. 18 indexed citations

16.

Hamersma, P.J., J. Ellenberger, & J.M.H. Fortuin. (1983). Derivation of a three-parameter model describing the results of steady-state shear stress-shear rate measurments of viscoelastic polymer solutions, wit. Chemical Engineering Science. 38(6). 819–825. 1 indexed citations

17.

Blok, W. J. & J.M.H. Fortuin. (1981). Method for determining diffusion coefficients of slightly soluble gases in liquids. Chemical Engineering Science. 36(10). 1687–1694. 43 indexed citations

18.

Fortuin, J.M.H., et al.. (1980). 55 Limit cycles measured in a liquid-phase reaction system. Chemical Engineering Science. 35(1-2). 439–445. 15 indexed citations

19.

Ellenberger, J., et al.. (1979). Shear stress and normal stress measurements of aqueous polymer solutions in a cone-and-plate rheogoniometer. Rheologica Acta. 18(3). 360–368. 3 indexed citations

20.

Fortuin, J.M.H.. (1961). Method for determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titrations. Analytica Chimica Acta. 24. 175–191. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact