JM Siegel
About
In The Last Decade
JM Siegel
7 papers receiving 589 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Cognitive Neuroscience 475
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 283
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 241
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
- Neurology 103
Countries citing papers authored by JM Siegel
This map shows the geographic impact of JM Siegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JM Siegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JM Siegel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by JM Siegel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by JM Siegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JM Siegel. The network helps show where JM Siegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of JM Siegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of JM Siegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of JM Siegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with JM Siegel. JM Siegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Numerical study of squeeze-flow in tilting disc mechanical heart valves. | 19 |
| 2 | 73 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 99 | |
| 6 | 140 | |
| 7 | 186 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.