J.M. Cózar-Olmo

789 total citations
79 papers, 530 citations indexed

About

J.M. Cózar-Olmo is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, J.M. Cózar-Olmo has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 530 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 29 papers in Surgery and 23 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in J.M. Cózar-Olmo's work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (30 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (29 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (14 papers). J.M. Cózar-Olmo is often cited by papers focused on Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (30 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (29 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (14 papers). J.M. Cózar-Olmo collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Italy and United Kingdom. J.M. Cózar-Olmo's co-authors include Antonio Alcaraz, F. Gómez-Veiga, Ignacio Puche‐Sanz, Fernando Vázquez‐Alonso, Clara Bermúdez‐Tamayo, Joaquı́n Carballido, A. Rodrı́guez-Antolı́n, Miguel Unda, R.A. Medina López and J.L. Ruiz-Cerdá and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Urology.

In The Last Decade

J.M. Cózar-Olmo

75 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J.M. Cózar-Olmo Spain 12 211 164 139 97 90 79 530
Joon Yau Leong United States 13 131 0.6× 100 0.6× 132 0.9× 33 0.3× 31 0.3× 59 505
Nicola Frego Italy 17 136 0.6× 242 1.5× 116 0.8× 27 0.3× 83 0.9× 63 652
Francesco Di Bello Italy 12 165 0.8× 195 1.2× 109 0.8× 76 0.8× 71 0.8× 97 473
Nahid Punjani United States 13 129 0.6× 188 1.1× 64 0.5× 45 0.5× 43 0.5× 90 636
Fernandes Denardi Brazil 15 255 1.2× 200 1.2× 159 1.1× 17 0.2× 52 0.6× 38 506
R. Tellini Italy 18 382 1.8× 341 2.1× 196 1.4× 28 0.3× 100 1.1× 50 799
Michael Metcalfe United States 16 148 0.7× 267 1.6× 87 0.6× 26 0.3× 94 1.0× 44 575
Michele Carlo Schiavi Italy 18 45 0.2× 204 1.2× 122 0.9× 26 0.3× 105 1.2× 63 940
Yao Zhu China 18 191 0.9× 226 1.4× 105 0.8× 29 0.3× 113 1.3× 47 754
Martin Baunacke Germany 16 335 1.6× 225 1.4× 110 0.8× 91 0.9× 49 0.5× 65 619

Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Cózar-Olmo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Cózar-Olmo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Cózar-Olmo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Cózar-Olmo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Cózar-Olmo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Cózar-Olmo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Cózar-Olmo. The network helps show where J.M. Cózar-Olmo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.M. Cózar-Olmo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.M. Cózar-Olmo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.M. Cózar-Olmo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.M. Cózar-Olmo. J.M. Cózar-Olmo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Borque‐Fernando, Ángel, Miguel Ángel Calleja‐Hernández, J.M. Cózar-Olmo, et al.. (2023). A multidisciplinary consensus statement on the optimal pharmacological treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 47(2). 111–126. 1 indexed citations
2.
Borque‐Fernando, Ángel, Miguel Ángel Calleja‐Hernández, J.M. Cózar-Olmo, et al.. (2023). Consenso multidisciplinar sobre idoneidad farmacológica en cáncer de próstata hormono-sensible metastásico. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 47(2). 111–126. 5 indexed citations
3.
Alcaraz, Antonio, Mauro Gacci, Vincenzo Ficarra, et al.. (2022). Efficacy and Safety of the Hexanic Extract of Serenoa repens vs. Watchful Waiting in Men with Moderate to Severe LUTS-BPH: Results of a Paired Matched Clinical Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(4). 967–967. 4 indexed citations
4.
5.
Alcaraz, Antonio, A. Rodrı́guez-Antolı́n, Joaquı́n Carballido, et al.. (2021). Efficacy and tolerability of the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens compared to tamsulosin in moderate-severe LUTS-BPH patients. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 19401–19401. 10 indexed citations
6.
Puche‐Sanz, Ignacio, Alba Rodríguez‐Martínez, M. Carmen Garrido-Navas, et al.. (2019). Biopsia líquida y cáncer de próstata. Evidencia actual aplicada a la clínica. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 44(3). 139–147. 10 indexed citations
7.
Socarrás, M.E. Rodríguez, et al.. (2019). Estado actual de la actividad y formación académica de residentes y urólogos jóvenes en España. Resultados de una encuesta nacional. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 43(4). 169–175. 10 indexed citations
8.
9.
Lacasa-Viscasillas, Isabel, et al.. (2017). Castrate resistant prostate cancer. Consensus recommendations of the Spanish Association of Urology. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 41(3). 141–145. 3 indexed citations
10.
Unda, Miguel, et al.. (2017). Actualización del papel de la quimioterapia endovesical en el cáncer de vejiga no músculo-invasivo. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 42(2). 73–76. 3 indexed citations
11.
Puche‐Sanz, Ignacio, et al.. (2016). Validación psicométrica de la versión en castellano del cuestionario USS-PROM para pacientes sometidos a cirugía de uretra anterior. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 40(5). 322–327. 8 indexed citations
12.
Alcaraz, Antonio, Joaquı́n Carballido, Miguel Unda, et al.. (2016). Quality of life in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH: change over time in real-life practice according to treatment—the QUALIPROST study. International Urology and Nephrology. 48(5). 645–656. 54 indexed citations
14.
Cózar-Olmo, J.M., et al.. (2015). La evaluación de competencias quirúrgicas como complemento al método formativo. Revisión. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 40(1). 55–63. 3 indexed citations
15.
Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Antonio, et al.. (2014). Papel de la tomografía por emisión de positrones/tomografía computarizada con análogos radiomarcados de colina en el cáncer de próstata. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 38(9). 613–621. 4 indexed citations
16.
Bermúdez‐Tamayo, Clara, et al.. (2013). Adapting the Content of Cancer Web Sites to the Information Needs of Patients: Reliability and Readability. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 19(12). 956–966. 20 indexed citations
17.
Vázquez‐Alonso, Fernando, et al.. (2012). Conservative Treatment of Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma of the Kidney: A Case Report. Current Urology. 6(1). 46–49. 1 indexed citations
18.
Bermúdez‐Tamayo, Clara, et al.. (2012). Factors related to use of the Internet as a source of health information by urological cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer. 20(12). 3087–3094. 16 indexed citations
19.
Cózar-Olmo, J.M., et al.. (2012). Consenso sobre el impacto clínico de la nueva evidencia científica disponible sobre hiperplasia benigna prostática. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 36(5). 265–275. 15 indexed citations
20.
Gómez-Veiga, F., et al.. (2011). Avances en uro-oncología “OncoForum”: lo mejor del 2010. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 35(6). 315–324. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026