J.L. Peterse

2.2k citations
42 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 21

J.L. Peterse

40 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

J.L. Peterse
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cancer Research 1.1k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 785
  • Oncology 921
  • Dermatology 180
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 159
Replace Yoshifumi Komoike with:
Yoshifumi Komoike Japan
J.C. Durand France
Sadako Akashi‐Tanaka Japan
S J Schnitt United States
Anna Marie Mulligan Canada
Masataka Yoshimoto Japan
Remigio M. Gregorio United States
Mark Sibbering United Kingdom
J.R. Vilcoq France
H Mouriesse France
J.L. Peterse relative to Yoshifumi Komoike Japan Yoshifumi Komoike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yoshifumi Komoike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.L. Peterse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.L. Peterse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.L. Peterse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.L. Peterse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.L. Peterse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.L. Peterse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.L. Peterse. The network helps show where J.L. Peterse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.L. Peterse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.L. Peterse Line = papers co-authored together J.L. Peterse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200736
2 200782
3 200764
4 200657
5 20051
6 200531
7 20045
8
[Young adults with Ewing's sarcoma].
20043
9 2003236
10 200333
11 20038
12
CBO-richtlijn 'behandeling van het mammacarcinoom'
200238
13 200257
14 200237
15 200240
16
[Diagnostics in clinically occult, radiologically suspect breast lesions more often surgery than needle diagnostics with image monitoring].
20011
17 20015
18 200175
19 200135
20 199316

About J.L. Peterse

J.L. Peterse is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Dermatology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (23 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (11 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (4 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (785 citations), Oncology (921 citations), Dermatology (180 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (159 citations). J.L. Peterse has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Marc J. van de Vijver, Vincenzo Eusebi, Emiel J. Rutgers, Rosemary R. Millis, B Zafrani, Roland Holland, D. Faverly, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Ian F. Faneyte and Jolanda Schrama. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Annals of Oncology and Histopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026