Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of JK Kirkwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JK Kirkwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JK Kirkwood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by JK Kirkwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JK Kirkwood. The network helps show where JK Kirkwood may publish in the future.
No nodes
All Works
6 of 6 papers shown
#
Work
Indexed citations
1
Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocationsbreakdown →
JK Kirkwood is a scholar working on Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (2 papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (102 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (209 citations) and Small Animals (103 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Animal Welfare.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.