Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Comparative Evaluation of Stress–Strain and Acoustic Emission Methods for Quantitative Damage Assessments of Brittle Rock
2014257 citationsJin-Seop Kim, Won‐Jin Cho et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jin-Seop Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jin-Seop Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jin-Seop Kim more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jin-Seop Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jin-Seop Kim. The network helps show where Jin-Seop Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jin-Seop Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jin-Seop Kim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jin-Seop Kim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jin-Seop Kim. Jin-Seop Kim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lee, Dong-Yeop, et al.. (2021). The Comparison Between Before and After Cross Bag Walking Intervention on Gait Parameter and Center of Pressure. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 911–917.2 indexed citations
Yang, Kyounghee, et al.. (2010). Textural and Geochemical Characteristics and their Relation of Spinel Peridotite Xenoliths from Jeju Island. The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea. 19(3). 227–244.3 indexed citations
15.
Kim, Jin-Seop, et al.. (2008). The Flow-rate Measurements in a Multi-phase Flow Pipeline by Using a Clamp-on Sealed Radioisotope Cross Correlation Flowmeter. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research. 33(1). 13–20.2 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Jin-Seop, Jong-Sun Kim, & Moon Son. (2002). Geochemical Study of Dyke Swarms, SE Korea. The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea. 11(3). 182–182.2 indexed citations
17.
Kim, Jin-Seop, Moon Son, Jong-Sun Kim, & In-Soo Kim. (2002). Tertiary Dyke Swarms and their Tectonic Importance in the Southeastern Part of the Korean Peninsula. The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea. 11(3). 169–169.7 indexed citations
18.
Kim, Hyun‐Joo, et al.. (2000). Comparative Sedimentology for the Lacustrine Deposits of the Upper Gyeongsang Supergroup in the Southeastern Gyeongsang Basin, Korea. Journal of the Korean earth science society. 21(4). 423–436.6 indexed citations
19.
Kim, Jin-Seop, et al.. (1999). Petrochemical Study on the Cretaceous Volcanic Rocks in the Namhae island, Korea. Journal of the Korean earth science society. 20(6). 640–640.1 indexed citations
20.
Cho, Myeong‐Woo, et al.. (1999). On-Machine Measurement of Sculptured Surfaces Based on CAD/CAM/CAI Integration : II. Inspection Planning Strategy. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering. 16(12). 109–118.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.