Jingxia Cai
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- P.S. Goldman-RakicAmy F.T. ArnstenBeth L. MurphyJing WuYongfu WangLei WangMing ZhangLin Xu
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jingxia Cai
19 papers receiving 938 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 526
- Cognitive Neuroscience 495
- Molecular Biology 191
- Behavioral Neuroscience 147
- Psychiatry and Mental health 130
Countries citing papers authored by Jingxia Cai
This map shows the geographic impact of Jingxia Cai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jingxia Cai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jingxia Cai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jingxia Cai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jingxia Cai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jingxia Cai. The network helps show where Jingxia Cai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jingxia Cai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jingxia Cai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jingxia Cai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jingxia Cai. Jingxia Cai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 60 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 89 | |
| 10 | 164 | |
| 11 | Aniracetam attenuates H2O2-induced deficiency of neuron viability, mitochondria potential and hippocampal long-term potentiation of mice in vitro. | 5 |
| 12 | Effects of Neonatal Tactile Stimulation and Maternal Separation on the Anxiety and the Emotional Memory in Adult Female Rats | 3 |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 72 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 454 | |
| 19 | 9 |
About Jingxia Cai
Jingxia Cai is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Neurology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 961 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (147 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (526 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (495 citations). Jingxia Cai has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include P.S. Goldman-Rakic, Amy F.T. Arnsten, Beth L. Murphy, Jing Wu, Yongfu Wang, Lei Wang, Yongfu Wang, Ming Zhang, Lin Xu and Zhifang Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Brain Research and British Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.