Jing‐Bao Nie

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 899 citations indexed

About

Jing‐Bao Nie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jing‐Bao Nie has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 899 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jing‐Bao Nie's work include Ethics in medical practice (15 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (10 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (10 papers). Jing‐Bao Nie is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (15 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (10 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (10 papers). Jing‐Bao Nie collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, China and United States. Jing‐Bao Nie's co-authors include David Jones, Joseph D. Tucker, Ruth Fitzgerald, Françoise Βaylis, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Paul R. Berg, Wensheng Wei, Bärbel Friedrich, Feng Shao and J. Keith Joung and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Jing‐Bao Nie

45 papers receiving 806 citations

Hit Papers

Adopt a moratorium on her... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jing‐Bao Nie New Zealand 16 213 211 209 194 131 51 899
Inmaculada de Melo‐Martín United States 17 205 1.0× 296 1.4× 78 0.4× 249 1.3× 99 0.8× 91 1.0k
Donna Dickenson United Kingdom 22 355 1.7× 473 2.2× 137 0.7× 161 0.8× 266 2.0× 83 1.4k
Ayo Wahlberg Denmark 20 215 1.0× 146 0.7× 43 0.2× 200 1.0× 66 0.5× 56 973
Maya Sabatello United States 19 159 0.7× 280 1.3× 84 0.4× 100 0.5× 52 0.4× 70 929
Bonnie Steinbock United States 17 257 1.2× 276 1.3× 83 0.4× 120 0.6× 81 0.6× 54 957
Kate Seear Australia 20 312 1.5× 286 1.4× 53 0.3× 329 1.7× 112 0.9× 105 1.3k
William M. McGuigan United States 12 260 1.2× 135 0.6× 151 0.7× 238 1.2× 66 0.5× 24 1.3k
Lori H. Erby United States 21 370 1.7× 278 1.3× 88 0.4× 162 0.8× 75 0.6× 53 1.3k
Molly McCarthy Australia 17 137 0.6× 120 0.6× 38 0.2× 324 1.7× 113 0.9× 58 1.0k
Carrie L. Johnson United States 19 430 2.0× 148 0.7× 220 1.1× 477 2.5× 25 0.2× 69 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jing‐Bao Nie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jing‐Bao Nie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jing‐Bao Nie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jing‐Bao Nie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jing‐Bao Nie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jing‐Bao Nie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jing‐Bao Nie. The network helps show where Jing‐Bao Nie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jing‐Bao Nie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jing‐Bao Nie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jing‐Bao Nie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jing‐Bao Nie. Jing‐Bao Nie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (2024). From Eugenics to Human Genome Editing: Bionationalism and Instrumentalizing Life in China within a Global Context. The Hastings Center Report. 54(S2). S102–S113. 1 indexed citations
2.
Nie, Jing‐Bao, et al.. (2023). Physician Multi-Site Practice in China: Doctor practices, public views and legitimacy based on a controversial case. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(3).
4.
Su, Zhaohui, Dean McDonnell, Barry L. Bentley, et al.. (2023). Nannies go rogue? A call for research into nanny-induced elder abuse in China. QJM. 117(8). 555–557. 1 indexed citations
5.
Nie, Jing‐Bao, et al.. (2020). Gendered caregiving and structural constraints: An empirical ethical study. Nursing Ethics. 28(3). 387–401. 6 indexed citations
6.
Nie, Jing‐Bao, et al.. (2020). Conflict of Interest in Scientific Research in China: A Socio-ethical Analysis of He Jiankui’s Human Genome-editing Experiment. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 17(2). 191–201. 8 indexed citations
7.
Fitzgerald, Ruth, et al.. (2020). “Unworthy of Care and Treatment”: Cultural Devaluation and Structural Constraints to Healthcare-Seeking for Older People in Rural China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(6). 2132–2132. 15 indexed citations
8.
Roberts, Kate, Anthony Dowell, & Jing‐Bao Nie. (2020). Utilising acupuncture for mental health; a mixed‐methods approach to understanding the awareness and experience of general practitioners and acupuncturists. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 39. 101114–101114. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lander, Eric S., Françoise Βaylis, Feng Zhang, et al.. (2019). Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing. Nature. 567(7747). 165–168. 251 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Nie, Jing‐Bao & David Jones. (2019). Confucianism and organ donation: moral duties from xiao (filial piety) to ren (humaneness). Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 22(4). 583–591. 14 indexed citations
11.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (2012). To Set a Gross Distortion Straight: A Reply to Reidar Lie's Book Review of Jing-Bao Nie's Medical Ethics in China: A Transcultural Interpretation (Routledge 2011). Asian Bioethics Review. 4(4). 399–406. 3 indexed citations
12.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (2012). The Fallacy and Dangers of Dichotomizing Cultural Differences: The Truth about Medical Truth Telling in China. The AMA Journal of Ethic. 14(4). 338–343. 4 indexed citations
13.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (2009). Limits of state intervention in sex-selective abortion: the case of China. Culture Health & Sexuality. 12(2). 205–219. 31 indexed citations
14.
Donchin, Anne, et al.. (2007). Special issue on feminist perspectives in bioethics. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
15.
Nie, Jing‐Bao & Alastair V. Campbell. (2007). Multiculturalism and Asian Bioethics: Cultural War or Creative Dialogue?. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 4(3). 163–167. 7 indexed citations
16.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (2005). CULTURAL VALUES EMBODYING UNIVERSAL NORMS: A CRITIQUE OF A POPULAR ASSUMPTION ABOUT CULTURES AND HUMAN RIGHTS. Developing World Bioethics. 5(3). 251–257. 11 indexed citations
17.
Chinouya, Martha, Donna Dickenson, Laura Duhan Kaplan, et al.. (2004). Linking Visions: Feminist Bioethics, Human Rights, and the Developing World. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 20 indexed citations
18.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (2004). The west's Dismissal of the Khabarovsk trial as ‘Communist Propaganda’: Ideology, evidence and international bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 1(1). 32–42. 13 indexed citations
19.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (2002). Chinese moral perspectives on abortion and foetal life: an historical account.. PubMed. 3(3). 15–31. 6 indexed citations
20.
Nie, Jing‐Bao. (1999). The Problem of Coerced Abortion in China and Related Ethical Issues. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 8(4). 463–475. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026