Jin Lin

418 citations
20 papers · 354 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science 8
    • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions 5
    • Catalysts for Methane Reforming 3

Jin Lin

17 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Jin Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Organic Chemistry 268
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 15
  • Catalysis 35
  • Inorganic Chemistry 50
  • Pharmaceutical Science 16
Replace Christian Ehinger with:
Christian Ehinger Switzerland
Mohammad Ali Amrollahi Iran
Robert W. Trainor Australia
Benjamin Ganchegui France
Bingbing Lai China
Robert R. A. Bolt United Kingdom
Naoya Kamata Japan
Mohsen Esmaeilpour Iran
Xiaopeng Zhang China
Junke Wang China
Jin Lin relative to Christian Ehinger Switzerland Christian Ehinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Christian Ehinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jin Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jin Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jin Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jin Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jin Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jin Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jin Lin. The network helps show where Jin Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jin Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jin Lin Line = papers co-authored together Jin Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2014195
2 201444
3 202126
4 201915
5 201913
6 201513
7 202312
8 20207
9 20107
10 20245
11 20254
12 20244
13 20232
14 20242
15 20242
16 20102
17 20201
18 20250
19 20250
20 20250

About Jin Lin

Jin Lin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Catalysis, Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (8 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (5 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (3 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (3 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (3 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (268 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (15 citations), Catalysis (35 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (50 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (16 citations). Jin Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Shijun Huang, Weiping Su, Jian Kan, Min Zhang, Lixian Wang, Chungu Xia, Shouxiang Lu, Wei Sun, Qian Li and Zhiqiang Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Fluids, Chemical Engineering Journal, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Applied Surface Science and Journal of environmental chemical engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact