Jin Lin

933 citations
52 papers · 722 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jin Lin

48 papers receiving 708 citations

Peers

Jin Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 64
  • Inorganic Chemistry 266
  • Catalysis 98
  • Pharmaceutical Science 83
  • Organic Chemistry 294
Replace Anthony P. Shaw with:
Anthony P. Shaw United States
Jiaxin He China
Lei Feng China
M. Koch Germany
Fengqi Zhang China
Liwei Niu China
Alak Bhattacharyya United States
Duo Zhang China
Hajime Kabashima Japan
Helmut Pennemann Germany
Jin Lin relative to Anthony P. Shaw United States Anthony P. Shaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.6×
Anthony P. Shaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jin Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jin Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jin Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jin Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jin Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jin Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jin Lin. The network helps show where Jin Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jin Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jin Lin Line = papers co-authored together Jin Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201799
2 202152
3 200844
4 201943
5 202337
6 201736
7 202129
8 202328
9 201327
10 201224
11 202221
12 202020
13 199119
14 201817
15 201715
16 201614
17 199113
18 202013
19 202213
20 202411

About Jin Lin

Jin Lin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Inorganic Chemistry and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 52 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (8 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (7 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (7 papers), Electrical Fault Detection and Protection (6 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (6 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (5 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (5 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (64 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (266 citations), Catalysis (98 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (83 citations) and Organic Chemistry (294 citations). Jin Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wei Sun, Shouxiang Lu, Weiping Su, Chungu Xia, Qiangsheng Sun, Shijun Huang, Changhai Li, Jian Kan, K.M. Liew and Yadong Li. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Catalysis Letters, ACS Catalysis, Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics and Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact