Jin Ho Kwak

88 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jin Ho Kwak
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 906
  • Geometry and Topology 328
  • Algebra and Number Theory 121
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 318
  • Artificial Intelligence 524
Replace Martin Škoviera with:
Martin Škoviera Slovakia
Aleksander Malnič Slovenia
Roman Nedela Slovakia
Tamás Szőnyi Hungary
Leo Storme Belgium
Marston Conder New Zealand
Hendrik Van Maldeghem Belgium
Akihiro Munemasa Japan
Felix Lazebnik United States
A. Blokhuis Netherlands
Jin Ho Kwak relative to Martin Škoviera Slovakia Martin Škoviera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Martin Škoviera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jin Ho Kwak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jin Ho Kwak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jin Ho Kwak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jin Ho Kwak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jin Ho Kwak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jin Ho Kwak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jin Ho Kwak. The network helps show where Jin Ho Kwak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jin Ho Kwak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jin Ho Kwak Line = papers co-authored together Jin Ho Kwak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200683
2 200463
3 199050
4 200647
5 200642
6 200441
7 200434
8 200232
9 200631
10 200630
11 200329
12 199628
13 200728
14 200328
15 200426
16 199424
17 199224
18 200522
19 200522
20 200721

About Jin Ho Kwak

Jin Ho Kwak is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Finite Group Theory Research (51 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (39 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (27 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (27 papers), Graph theory and applications (16 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (13 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (9 papers) and Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (906 citations), Geometry and Topology (328 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (121 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (318 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (524 citations). Jin Ho Kwak has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, China and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Yan‐Quan Feng, Jaeun Lee, Shaofei Du, Young Soo Kwon, Mingyao Xu, Roman Nedela, Rongquan Feng, Kaishun Wang, Jin‐Xin Zhou and Martin Škoviera. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, European Journal of Combinatorics, Journal of Graph Theory, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B and Linear Algebra and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact