Jill Littrell
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth BeckJosé B. AshfordFred BrooksSadhna DiwanPeter LyonsJeffrey R. LacasseCharles BryantMary L. Ohmer
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers)Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jill Littrell
41 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Clinical Psychology 147
- Social Psychology 101
- General Health Professions 73
- Sociology and Political Science 73
- Psychiatry and Mental health 46
Countries citing papers authored by Jill Littrell
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Littrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Littrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Littrell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Littrell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Littrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Littrell. The network helps show where Jill Littrell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Littrell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Littrell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Littrell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Littrell. Jill Littrell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Controversies in Psychiatry and DSM-5: The Relevance for Social Work | 2 |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | Social Workers' Attitudes Towards Welfare Programs: Comparing AFDC to Work Programs | 2 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 65 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | Impact of small group dynamics on focus group data: Implications for social work research | 2 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Biological, psychological, and social aspects of alcohol consumption and abuse | 1 |
| 20 | 23 |
About Jill Littrell
Jill Littrell is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (147 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (14 citations). Jill Littrell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Beck, José B. Ashford, Fred Brooks, Sadhna Diwan, Peter Lyons, Jeffrey R. Lacasse, Charles Bryant and Mary L. Ohmer. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Frontiers in Psychology and Children and Youth Services Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.