Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Atlas of quasar energy distributions
19941.1k citationsM. Elvis, B. J. Wilkes et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Bechtold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Bechtold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Bechtold more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Bechtold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Bechtold. The network helps show where Jill Bechtold may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Bechtold
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Bechtold.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Bechtold based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Bechtold. Jill Bechtold is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Prieto, J. L., Matthew D. Kistler, T. A. Thompson, et al.. (2008). Discovery of the Dust-Enshrouded Progenitor of the Type IIn SN 2008S with Spitzer. arXiv (Cornell University).
6.
Hill, J. E., P. Garnavich, O. Kuhn, et al.. (2007). GRB 070419A, deep LBT photometry and possible supernova detection.. GCN. 6486. 1.2 indexed citations
Ge, J. & Jill Bechtold. (1999). H_2 and C I in Damped LY alpha Quasar Absorbers at Intermediate and High Redshifts. ASPC. 156. 121.1 indexed citations
11.
Siemiginowska, Aneta, Jill Bechtold, Thomas L. Aldcroft, Kim K. McLeod, & Charles R. Keeton. (1998). Q1208+1011: Search for the Lensing Galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal. 503(1). 118–124.5 indexed citations
12.
Bechtold, Jill. (1997). Shadows of Creation: Quasar Absorption Lines and the Genesis of Galaxies. Sky and Telescope. 94(3). 28.
13.
Ellingson, E., H. K. C. Yee, Jill Bechtold, R. Elston, & R. G. Carlberg. (1996). An ultra-luminous proto-galaxy candidate discovered by the CNOC survey.. JRASC. 90(5). 313–314.1 indexed citations
Frye, Brenda, Jill Bechtold, Leonidas A. Moustakas, & A. Dobrzycki. (1993). Absorption spectra of Q 0000 - 263 and 1442 + 101. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 263(3). 575–588.4 indexed citations
17.
Bechtold, Jill. (1992). The Lyman Alpha Forest. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 181. 140.1 indexed citations
18.
Tripp, Todd M., et al.. (1990). IUE Observations of PG 1115 + 080: The Hel Gunn-Peterson Test and a Search for the Lensing Galaxy. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 22. 805.1 indexed citations
19.
Bechtold, Jill, R. J. Weymann, Zhong-Yi Lin, & M. A. Malkan. (1986). The Integrated Ultraviolet Radiation Field From QSOs. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 18. 924.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.