Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
19971.2k citationsJill AndersonThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseaseprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Anderson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Anderson. The network helps show where Jill Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Anderson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Anderson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Anderson. Jill Anderson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Houghton, Ann‐Marie & Jill Anderson. (2017). Embedding mental wellbeing in the curriculum: maximising success in higher education. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).48 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Matthew, et al.. (2015). Understanding provision for students with mental health problems and intensive support needs : Report to HEFCE by the Institute for Employment Studies (IES) and Researching Equity, Access and Partnership (REAP). Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).16 indexed citations
3.
Anderson, Jill. (2013). Misreading Like a Lawyer: Cognitive Bias in Statutory Interpretation. Harvard Law Review. 127(6). 1521–1592.2 indexed citations
Anderson, Jill. (2012). Effects of Original Songwriting in Music Therapy Sessions on the Hospice Experience and Bereavement Process of Patients and Their Families.1 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, Jill, et al.. (2011). Developing emotional intelligence, resilience and skills for maintaining personal wellbeing in students of health and social care. Insight (University of Cumbria).6 indexed citations
Anderson, Jill, et al.. (1997). Detection of serum antibodies to Helicobacter pylori by an immunochromatographic method.. PubMed. 92(7). 1135–9.8 indexed citations
11.
Anderson, Jill. (1997). Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 185(11). 713–713.1231 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.