Cille Kennedy
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Somnath ChatterjiNenad KostanjsekCharles B. PullJoAnne E. Epping‐JordanShekhar SaxenaMichael Von KorffJürgen RehmT. Bedirhan Üstün
- Topics
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandPakistan
In The Last Decade
Cille Kennedy
13 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Psychiatry and Mental health 595
- Clinical Psychology 556
- General Health Professions 364
- Social Psychology 320
- Epidemiology 272
Countries citing papers authored by Cille Kennedy
This map shows the geographic impact of Cille Kennedy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cille Kennedy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cille Kennedy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cille Kennedy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cille Kennedy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cille Kennedy. The network helps show where Cille Kennedy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cille Kennedy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cille Kennedy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cille Kennedy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cille Kennedy. Cille Kennedy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 62 | |
| 3 | Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0breakdown → | 1258 |
| 4 | WHO assessment schedule for measuring disability Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 | 2 |
| 5 | 140 | |
| 6 | 84 | |
| 7 | 108 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 22 |
About Cille Kennedy
Cille Kennedy is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (595 citations), Clinical Psychology (556 citations) and Health (169 citations). Cille Kennedy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Somnath Chatterji, Nenad Kostanjsek, Charles B. Pull, JoAnne E. Epping‐Jordan, Shekhar Saxena, Michael Von Korff, Jürgen Rehm, T. Bedirhan Üstün, Bedirhan Üstün and Darrel A. Regier. Their work appears in journals such as Health Affairs, Journal of Social Issues and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.