Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Light pseudoscalars, particle physics and cosmology
This map shows the geographic impact of Jihn E. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jihn E. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jihn E. Kim more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jihn E. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jihn E. Kim. The network helps show where Jihn E. Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jihn E. Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jihn E. Kim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jihn E. Kim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jihn E. Kim. Jihn E. Kim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baer, Howard, Ki-Young Choi, Jihn E. Kim, & Leszek Roszkowski. (2014). Non-thermal dark matter: supersymmetric axions and other candidates. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
7.
Barr, S. M. & Jihn E. Kim. (2014). New confining force solution of QCD domain wall problem. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Cho, Won‐Sang, Jihn E. Kim, & Jihun Kim. (2009). Shining on buried new particles. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
11.
Huh, Ji-Haeng, Jihn E. Kim, & Bumseok Kyae. (2008). Two dark matter components in N_{DM}MSSM and PAMELA data. arXiv (Cornell University).7 indexed citations
12.
Choi, Kiwoon, Jihn E. Kim, & Dong-Chul Son. (2005). The 11th International Symposium on Particles, Strings and Cosmology. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 805.8 indexed citations
13.
Kim, Jihn E., Bumseok Kyae, & Qaisar Shafi. (2003). Brane gravity, massless bulk scalar and self-tuning solution of the cosmological constant problem. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
14.
Kim, Jihn E.. (2003). $Z_3$ orbifold construction of $SU(3)^3$ GUT with $\sin^2\theta_W=3/8$. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
15.
Choi, Kang-Sin & Jihn E. Kim. (2002). $Z_2$ orbifold compactification of heterotic string and 6D SO(14) flavor unification model. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Jihn E., Bumseok Kyae, & Hyun Min Lee. (2001). Effective supersymmetric theory and $(g-2)_\mu$ with R parity violation. arXiv (Cornell University).3 indexed citations
17.
Kim, Jihn E.. (1998). Cosmic Axion. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
18.
Kim, Jihn E.. (1985). Composite invisible axion. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 31(7). 1733–1735.81 indexed citations
19.
Choi, Kiwoon & Jihn E. Kim. (1985). Dynamical axion. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 32(7). 1828–1834.48 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.