Jessica E. M. Dunleavy
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Shinichi NakagawaSheri L. JohnsonNeil J. GemmellMoira K. O’BryanLiza O’DonnellPeter G. StantonAnne E. O’ConnorD. Jo Merriner
- Topics
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (12 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers)Sperm and Testicular Function (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Jessica E. M. Dunleavy
18 papers receiving 600 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Reproductive Medicine 383
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 253
- Molecular Biology 204
- Genetics 144
- Cell Biology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Jessica E. M. Dunleavy
This map shows the geographic impact of Jessica E. M. Dunleavy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jessica E. M. Dunleavy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jessica E. M. Dunleavy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jessica E. M. Dunleavy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jessica E. M. Dunleavy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jessica E. M. Dunleavy. The network helps show where Jessica E. M. Dunleavy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jessica E. M. Dunleavy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jessica E. M. Dunleavy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jessica E. M. Dunleavy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jessica E. M. Dunleavy. Jessica E. M. Dunleavy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 118 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 271 |
About Jessica E. M. Dunleavy
Jessica E. M. Dunleavy is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Cell Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (12 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (383 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (253 citations) and Aging (12 citations). Jessica E. M. Dunleavy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shinichi Nakagawa, Sheri L. Johnson, Neil J. Gemmell, Moira K. O’Bryan, Liza O’Donnell, Peter G. Stanton, Anne E. O’Connor, D. Jo Merriner, Mari S. Lehti and Daniela Fietz. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Development and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.