Jeremy Cone
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Melissa J. FergusonThomas GilovichYoel InbarDavid G. RandThomas C. MannRon DotschRyan F. LeiJazmin L. Brown‐Iannuzzi
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumGermany
In The Last Decade
Jeremy Cone
21 papers receiving 507 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Sociology and Political Science 287
- Cognitive Neuroscience 211
- Social Psychology 191
- Applied Psychology 97
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
Countries citing papers authored by Jeremy Cone
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeremy Cone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeremy Cone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeremy Cone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeremy Cone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeremy Cone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeremy Cone. The network helps show where Jeremy Cone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeremy Cone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeremy Cone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeremy Cone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeremy Cone. Jeremy Cone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 106 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 99 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Jeremy Cone
Jeremy Cone is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (71 citations), Applied Psychology (97 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (211 citations). Jeremy Cone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Melissa J. Ferguson, Thomas Gilovich, Yoel Inbar, David G. Rand, Thomas C. Mann, Ron Dotsch, Ryan F. Lei, Jazmin L. Brown‐Iannuzzi, Jeff Moher and Brianna Heggeseth. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.