Jeremy Cone

1.0k total citations
21 papers, 529 citations indexed

About

Jeremy Cone is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jeremy Cone has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 529 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 10 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jeremy Cone's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers). Jeremy Cone is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers). Jeremy Cone collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Jeremy Cone's co-authors include Melissa J. Ferguson, Thomas Gilovich, Yoel Inbar, David G. Rand, Thomas C. Mann, Ryan F. Lei, Ron Dotsch, Jazmin L. Brown‐Iannuzzi, Jeff Moher and Brianna Heggeseth and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jeremy Cone

21 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jeremy Cone United States 12 287 211 191 97 88 21 529
Jamie B. Luguri United States 10 348 1.2× 400 1.9× 232 1.2× 67 0.7× 33 0.4× 16 711
Jolie Baumann United States 6 195 0.7× 163 0.8× 399 2.1× 102 1.1× 88 1.0× 7 632
André Mata Portugal 14 163 0.6× 205 1.0× 123 0.6× 83 0.9× 47 0.5× 58 515
Kristen J. Klaaren United States 4 155 0.5× 143 0.7× 144 0.8× 125 1.3× 81 0.9× 4 544
Tali Kleiman Israel 16 168 0.6× 164 0.8× 270 1.4× 157 1.6× 175 2.0× 22 646
Erin Sparks Canada 7 128 0.4× 105 0.5× 105 0.5× 114 1.2× 51 0.6× 10 500
Ewa Szumowska Poland 13 194 0.7× 106 0.5× 113 0.6× 87 0.9× 76 0.9× 35 444
X.T. Wang United States 7 119 0.4× 104 0.5× 109 0.6× 138 1.4× 135 1.5× 10 493
Mario Weick United Kingdom 13 342 1.2× 148 0.7× 345 1.8× 80 0.8× 76 0.9× 34 629
Steven Sweldens Netherlands 11 352 1.2× 213 1.0× 277 1.5× 164 1.7× 150 1.7× 21 716

Countries citing papers authored by Jeremy Cone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeremy Cone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeremy Cone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeremy Cone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeremy Cone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeremy Cone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeremy Cone. The network helps show where Jeremy Cone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeremy Cone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeremy Cone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeremy Cone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeremy Cone. Jeremy Cone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cone, Jeremy, et al.. (2021). Nationality dominates gender in decision-making in the Dictator and Prisoner’s Dilemma Games. PLoS ONE. 16(1). e0244568–e0244568. 11 indexed citations
2.
Ferguson, Melissa J. & Jeremy Cone. (2021). The Role of Intentionality in Priming. Psychological Inquiry. 32(1). 38–40. 1 indexed citations
3.
Cone, Jeremy, et al.. (2021). The Long-Term Effects of New Evidence on Implicit Impressions of Other People. Psychological Science. 32(2). 173–188. 14 indexed citations
4.
Cone, Jeremy & Jimmy Calanchini. (2020). A Process Dissociation Model of Implicit Rapid Revision in Response to Diagnostic Revelations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 47(2). 201–215. 6 indexed citations
5.
Cone, Jeremy, et al.. (2020). Opposing contributions of psychologically distinct components of empathy to empathic accuracy.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 149(11). 2169–2186. 10 indexed citations
6.
Cone, Jeremy, Jazmin L. Brown‐Iannuzzi, Ryan F. Lei, & Ron Dotsch. (2020). Type I Error Is Inflated in the Two-Phase Reverse Correlation Procedure. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12(5). 760–768. 34 indexed citations
7.
Cone, Jeremy, et al.. (2020). Perceptual salience influences food choices independently of health and taste preferences. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 5(1). 2–2. 24 indexed citations
8.
Dessel, Pieter Van, Jeremy Cone, Anne Gast, & Jan De Houwer. (2019). The impact of valenced verbal information on implicit and explicit evaluation: the role of information diagnosticity, primacy, and memory cueing. Cognition & Emotion. 34(1). 74–85. 10 indexed citations
9.
Mann, Thomas C., Jeremy Cone, Brianna Heggeseth, & Melissa J. Ferguson. (2019). Updating implicit impressions: New evidence on intentionality and the affect misattribution procedure.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 116(3). 349–374. 28 indexed citations
10.
Ferguson, Melissa J., et al.. (2019). When and How Implicit First Impressions Can Be Updated. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 28(4). 331–336. 33 indexed citations
11.
Cone, Jeremy, et al.. (2019). Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(20). 9802–9807. 29 indexed citations
12.
Ruisch, Benjamin C., et al.. (2018). Dual and Single-Process Perspectives on the Role of Threat Detection in Evaluation. Psychological Inquiry. 29(1). 27–27. 1 indexed citations
13.
Savitsky, Kenneth, et al.. (2016). Haters are all the same: Perceptions of group homogeneity following positive vs. negative feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 64. 50–56. 2 indexed citations
14.
Cone, Jeremy & Melissa J. Ferguson. (2014). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 108(1). 37–57. 106 indexed citations
15.
Cone, Jeremy & David G. Rand. (2014). Time Pressure Increases Cooperation in Competitively Framed Social Dilemmas. PLoS ONE. 9(12). e115756–e115756. 60 indexed citations
16.
Cone, Jeremy & David G. Rand. (2014). Time Pressure Increases Cooperation in Competitively Framed Social Dilemmas: A Successful Replication. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
17.
Ferguson, Melissa J. & Jeremy Cone. (2013). The Mind in Motivation: A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Role of Consciousness in Goal Pursuit. Oxford University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations
18.
Mikels, Joseph A., Elaine O. Cheung, Jeremy Cone, & Thomas Gilovich. (2012). The dark side of intuition: Aging and increases in nonoptimal intuitive decisions.. Emotion. 13(2). 189–195. 27 indexed citations
19.
Cone, Jeremy & Thomas Gilovich. (2010). Understanding money's limits: People's beliefs about the income – Happiness correlation. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 5(4). 294–301. 14 indexed citations
20.
Inbar, Yoel, Jeremy Cone, & Thomas Gilovich. (2010). People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99(2). 232–247. 99 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026