Jens‐Peter Kreiß
- Statistics and Probability top 0.5%
- Finance top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- Efstathios PaparoditisWolfgang Karl HärdleJoël L. HorowitzJürgen FrankeMichael H. NeumannMarco MeyerCarsten JentschQiwei Yao
- Topics
- Statistical Methods and Inference (29 papers)Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (23 papers)Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyCyprusUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jens‐Peter Kreiß
44 papers receiving 890 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Statistics and Probability 526
- Finance 469
- Economics and Econometrics 240
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 200
- Artificial Intelligence 128
Countries citing papers authored by Jens‐Peter Kreiß
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens‐Peter Kreiß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens‐Peter Kreiß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens‐Peter Kreiß more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens‐Peter Kreiß
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens‐Peter Kreiß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens‐Peter Kreiß. The network helps show where Jens‐Peter Kreiß may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens‐Peter Kreiß
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens‐Peter Kreiß. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens‐Peter Kreiß based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens‐Peter Kreiß. Jens‐Peter Kreiß is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Extrapolation of GIDAS accident data to Europe | 4 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | GIDAS-Aided Quantification of the Effectiveness of Traffic Safety Measures in EU 27 | 2 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Properties of the Nonparametric Autoregressive Bootstrap | 3 |
| 17 | 174 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Jens‐Peter Kreiß
Jens‐Peter Kreiß is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Finance and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 46 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Inference (29 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (23 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (526 citations), Finance (469 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (200 citations). Jens‐Peter Kreiß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Cyprus and United States. Frequent co-authors include Efstathios Paparoditis, Wolfgang Karl Härdle, Joël L. Horowitz, Jürgen Franke, Michael H. Neumann, Marco Meyer, Carsten Jentsch, Qiwei Yao, Juan J. Hidalgo and Thorsten Fink. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Biometrics and Journal of Econometrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.