Jens Petersen
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roland MitrićVlasta Bonačić‐KouteckýMatthias WohlgemuthMerle I. S. RöhrM. BroyerPhilippe DugourdIngo FischerRodolphe Antoine
- Topics
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (21 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (21 papers)Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jens Petersen
40 papers receiving 687 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 394
- Materials Chemistry 234
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 173
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 112
- Spectroscopy 109
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Petersen
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Petersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Petersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Petersen. The network helps show where Jens Petersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Petersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Petersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Petersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Petersen. Jens Petersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Jens Petersen
Jens Petersen is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (21 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (21 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (173 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (394 citations) and Spectroscopy (109 citations). Jens Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roland Mitrić, Vlasta Bonačić‐Koutecký, Matthias Wohlgemuth, Merle I. S. Röhr, M. Broyer, Philippe Dugourd, Ingo Fischer, Rodolphe Antoine, Alexander Kulesza and Ute Werner. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.